Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Biophysics top 5%
- Media Technology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Vinod ChandranJasmine BanksKhamael Al-DulaimiKien NguyenNasir HussainSeyedmohammad SalehiMohammad A. RazzaqueAiman Al-Sabaawi
- Topics
- Biometric Identification and Security (11 papers)Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (9 papers)Image Processing Techniques and Applications (7 papers)
In The Last Decade
Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes
27 papers receiving 344 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 208
- Artificial Intelligence 134
- Biophysics 65
- Media Technology 64
- Biomedical Engineering 60
Countries citing papers authored by Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes
This map shows the geographic impact of Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes. The network helps show where Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes. Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 49 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | Classification of white blood cell types from microscope images:Techniques and challenges | 46 |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | Part based bit error analysis of iris codes | 1 |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | Cell image classification using histograms, higher order statistics and adaboost | 1 |
| 17 | Iris Based Identity Verification Robust to Sample Presentation Security Attacks | 2 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes
Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes is a scholar working on Media Technology, Signal Processing and Biophysics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biometric Identification and Security (11 papers), Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases (9 papers) and Image Processing Techniques and Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (65 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (208 citations) and Media Technology (64 citations). Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Spain and Iraq. Frequent co-authors include Vinod Chandran, Jasmine Banks, Khamael Al-Dulaimi, Kien Nguyen, Nasir Hussain, Seyedmohammad Salehi, Mohammad A. Razzaque, Aiman Al-Sabaawi, Eva Rajo‐Iglesias and Arun Ross. Their work appears in journals such as Sensors, Pattern Recognition and Pattern Recognition Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.