Ingo Borchert

32 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers

Ingo Borchert
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 573
  • Development 84
  • Strategy and Management 326
  • Economics and Econometrics 328
  • Finance 73
Replace Felicitas Nowak‐Lehmann with:
Felicitas Nowak‐Lehmann Germany
Jerónimo Carballo United States
Andreas Moxnes Norway
John Romalis United States
Rodney E. Falvey Australia
Marco Fugazza United States
Irene Brambilla Argentina
Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås Sweden
Maurício Mesquita Moreira United States
Alberto Portugal-Pérez United States
Ingo Borchert relative to Felicitas Nowak‐Lehmann Germany Felicitas Nowak‐Lehmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Felicitas Nowak‐Lehmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Borchert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Borchert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Borchert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Borchert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Borchert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Borchert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Borchert. The network helps show where Ingo Borchert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ingo Borchert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingo Borchert Line = papers co-authored together Ingo Borchert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013126
2 202096
3 201080
4 201761
5 201860
6
Unfinished Business? The WTO's Doha Agenda
201154
7 201252
8 202129
9 201229
10 201215
11 201514
12 201613
13 201612
14 200911
15 20208
16 20207
17 20217
18 20156
19
Services trade in the UK: what is at stake?
20164
20 20164

About Ingo Borchert

Ingo Borchert is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Finance, having authored 33 papers that have together received 717 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (28 papers), International Business and FDI (8 papers), Global Trade and Competitiveness (7 papers), World Trade Organization Law (5 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (5 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (5 papers), Maritime Ports and Logistics (4 papers) and ICT Impact and Policies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (573 citations), Development (84 citations), Strategy and Management (326 citations), Economics and Econometrics (328 citations) and Finance (73 citations). Ingo Borchert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Aaditya Mattoo, Yoto V. Yotov, Batshur Gootiiz, Mario Larch, Serge Shikher, James E. Anderson, Aaditya Mattoo, Alessandro Barattieri, Arti Grover and Arti Grover Goswami. Their work appears in journals such as The World Bank Economic Review, Journal of Comparative Economics, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique, World Economy and European Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact