Inger Grete Krogh Andersen

41 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Inger Grete Krogh Andersen
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Organic Chemistry 169
  • Molecular Biology 168
  • Inorganic Chemistry 66
  • Spectroscopy 55
  • Biomedical Engineering 46
Replace L. Jaenicke with:
L. Jaenicke Germany
Ragnar Lundén Sweden
Robert R. Engle United States
Jacques M. Waisvisz Netherlands
Yoshiharu Nawata United States
Gerhard Bauer Germany
C. H. ISSIDORIDES Lebanon
James Cason United States
F. A. Hochstein United States
Reuben G. Jones United States
Inger Grete Krogh Andersen relative to L. Jaenicke Germany L. Jaenicke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
L. Jaenicke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inger Grete Krogh Andersen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inger Grete Krogh Andersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inger Grete Krogh Andersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inger Grete Krogh Andersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inger Grete Krogh Andersen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inger Grete Krogh Andersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inger Grete Krogh Andersen. The network helps show where Inger Grete Krogh Andersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inger Grete Krogh Andersen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inger Grete Krogh Andersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inger Grete Krogh Andersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inger Grete Krogh Andersen. Inger Grete Krogh Andersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 12
3 1
4 14
5 3
6 23
7 3
8 12
9 17
10 20
11 10
12 18
13 7
14 15
15 26
16 7
17 52
18 1
19 30
20 4

About Inger Grete Krogh Andersen

Inger Grete Krogh Andersen is a scholar working on Toxicology, Pharmaceutical Science and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 42 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (4 papers) and Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (169 citations), Toxicology (20 citations) and Biochemistry (39 citations). Inger Grete Krogh Andersen has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jon Munch‐Petersen, Sture Forsén, Ingvar Lindqvist, Knut Lundquist, Carl‐Ivar Brändén, Erich Adler, Aage Jart, T. Nikkari, Kale Juva and Lars Svennerholm. Their work appears in journals such as Analytica Chimica Acta, Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry and European Journal of Mineralogy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026