Countries citing papers authored by Inge Zwitserlood
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Zwitserlood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Zwitserlood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Zwitserlood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Zwitserlood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Zwitserlood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Zwitserlood. The network helps show where Inge Zwitserlood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inge Zwitserlood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inge Zwitserlood.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inge Zwitserlood based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Inge Zwitserlood. Inge Zwitserlood is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kooij, Els van der, Inge Zwitserlood, & Onno Crasborn. (2023). Strategies for new word formation in NGT. Sign Language & Linguistics. 26(2). 176–217.2 indexed citations
2.
Zwitserlood, Inge, Els van der Kooij, & Onno Crasborn. (2023). Units of sub-sign meaning in NGT. Sign Language & Linguistics. 26(2). 276–322.1 indexed citations
3.
Enfield, N. J., Tanya Stivers, Penelope Brown, et al.. (2018). Polar answers. Journal of Linguistics. 55(2). 277–304.42 indexed citations
Perniss, Pamela, et al.. (2014). Learning to express "left-right" & "front-behind" in a sign versus spoken language. Cognitive Science. 1550–1555.8 indexed citations
6.
Zwitserlood, Inge, et al.. (2012). Development of locative expressions by Turkish deaf and hearing children: Are there modality effects?. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 568–580.4 indexed citations
Perniss, Pamela, Inge Zwitserlood, & Aslı Özyürek. (2011). Does space structure spatial language? Linguistic encoding of space in sign languages. Cognitive Science. 33(33). 1595–1600.6 indexed citations
Zwitserlood, Inge. (2009). Het Corpus NGT. 6. 44–45.2 indexed citations
12.
Zwitserlood, Inge, Aslı Özyürek, & Pamela Perniss. (2008). Annotation of sign and gesture cross-linguistically. Language Resources and Evaluation. 185–190.2 indexed citations
13.
Crasborn, Onno & Inge Zwitserlood. (2008). Annotation of video data in the Corpus NGT. Radboud Repository (Radboud University).3 indexed citations
14.
Crasborn, Onno, et al.. (2008). Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora. 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages.24 indexed citations
15.
Crasborn, Onno & Inge Zwitserlood. (2008). The Corpus NGT: An online corpus for professionals and laymen. Max Planck Digital Library. 44–49.49 indexed citations
Zwitserlood, Inge, et al.. (2005). Multimedia with Animated Sign Language for Deaf Learners. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2005(1). 4759–4764.6 indexed citations
Zwitserlood, Inge. (2002). The complex structure of ‘simple’ signs in NGT. Max Planck Digital Library. 232–246.1 indexed citations
20.
Zwitserlood, Inge, et al.. (1999). Pluralization in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Max Planck Digital Library. 58–78.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.