This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Tvedten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Tvedten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Tvedten more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Tvedten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Tvedten. The network helps show where Inge Tvedten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inge Tvedten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inge Tvedten.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inge Tvedten based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Inge Tvedten. Inge Tvedten is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2018). Urban poverty in Luanda, Angola. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).1 indexed citations
2.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2018). Comparing urban and rural poverty in Angola. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).1 indexed citations
3.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2016). Urban poverty and inequality in Luanda, Angola. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)). 17.4 indexed citations
4.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2016). Pobreza urbana e desigualdade em Luanda, Angola. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)). 17.
5.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2013). Gender, class and space in Maputo, Mozambique. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)). 7.1 indexed citations
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2011). 'Xiculungo' Revisited Assessing the Implications of PARPA II in Maputo 2007-2010. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)).5 indexed citations
8.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2010). Assessing the implications of PARPA II in rural Northern Mozambique 2006-2009. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)). 5.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2009). Monitoring and evaluating Mozambique's poverty reduction strategy PARPA 2006-2008. A synopsis of three qualitative studies on rural and urban poverty. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).11 indexed citations
11.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2008). Gender Policies and Feminisation of Poverty in Mozambique. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).16 indexed citations
12.
Tvedten, Inge & Espen Villanger. (2008). Accounting for poverty reduction in Norwegian development aid to Mozambique. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).
13.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2008). Monitoring and Evaluating Poverty Reduction Policies in Mozambique. Study 2: Social Relations of Urban Poverty. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). 3.2 indexed citations
14.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2008). Políticas de Género e Feminização da Pobreza em Moçambique. CMI Report.
15.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2006). Experience and Institutional Capacity for Poverty and Income Distribution Analysis in Angola. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).8 indexed citations
16.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2003). Angola 2002/2003. Key Development Issues and Democratic Decentralisation. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).3 indexed citations
17.
Tvedten, Inge, et al.. (2002). Angola 2001/2002. Key Development Issues and Aid in a Context of Peace. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).2 indexed citations
18.
Tvedten, Inge. (2001). Angola 2000/2001. Key Development Issues and the Role of NGOs. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.