Inge Koch

847 citations
52 papers · 592 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Inge Koch

49 papers receiving 562 citations

Peers

Inge Koch
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Statistics and Probability 69
  • Computer Science Applications 14
  • Computational Mathematics 1
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 40
  • Finance 12
Replace Robert G. Aykroyd with:
Robert G. Aykroyd United Kingdom
Jianhua Zhao China
Shannon R. Bowling United States
Keh‐Shin Lii United States
Jens Breckling Australia
Pedro A. Morettin Brazil
Richard J. Meinhold United States
Guy Mélard Belgium
Xavier Guyon France
Herbert A. David United States
Inge Koch relative to Robert G. Aykroyd United Kingdom Robert G. Aykroyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Robert G. Aykroyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inge Koch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Koch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Koch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Koch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Koch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Koch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Koch. The network helps show where Inge Koch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inge Koch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inge Koch Line = papers co-authored together Inge Koch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200876
2 201376
3 201946
4 200933
5 202431
6 199222
7 200320
8 200720
9 201619
10 201218
11 200914
12 200112
13 200212
14 200512
15 201512
16 199611
17 200411
18 198210
19 201210
20 20139

About Inge Koch

Inge Koch is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Mechanics of Materials, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Spectroscopy and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 52 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Applications (8 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (4 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (3 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (2 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (2 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (2 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (1 paper) and Climate variability and models (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (69 citations), Computer Science Applications (14 citations), Computational Mathematics (1 citation), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (40 citations) and Finance (12 citations). Inge Koch has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include MATTHEW P. WAND, Tarn Duong, Navid Shokouhi, Abd‐Krim Seghouane, Peter M. Hall, I.K. Craig, Zara Ersozlu, M. C. Jones, Sona Taheri and Paul H. Garthwaite. Their work appears in journals such as Ultrasonic Imaging, Electronic Journal of Statistics, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, BMC Bioinformatics and International Journal of Climatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact