Inese Čakstiņa
- Genetics top 5%
- Mesenchymal stem cell research 5
- Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities 2
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction 2
- Urology top 10%
-
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis 3
-
- RNA Research and Splicing 3
- Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 2
-
- Bone Tissue Engineering Materials 2
-
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes 2
- Co-authors
- Indriķis MuižnieksUna RiekstiņaJānis AncānsRuta MucenieceMartin J. HoogduijnVadims ParfejevsLīga StīpnieceNityanand Jain
- Cited by
- GeneticsUrologyRehabilitation
- Journals
- Plant Molecular Biology (1 paper)Cell Research (1 paper)Journal of the European Ceramic Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- LatviaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Inese Čakstiņa
16 papers receiving 487 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Genetics 252
- Urology 32
- Rehabilitation 34
- Biomaterials 57
- Surgery 173
Countries citing papers authored by Inese Čakstiņa
This map shows the geographic impact of Inese Čakstiņa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inese Čakstiņa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inese Čakstiņa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inese Čakstiņa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inese Čakstiņa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inese Čakstiņa. The network helps show where Inese Čakstiņa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inese Čakstiņa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 5 | Electrically Active and 3D Porous TiO2-x Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration | 2017 | 19 |
| 6 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 258 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 97 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 16 |
About Inese Čakstiņa
Inese Čakstiņa is a scholar working on Genetics, Oral Surgery and Automotive Engineering, having authored 16 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mesenchymal stem cell research (5 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (2 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (2 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (252 citations), Urology (32 citations) and Rehabilitation (34 citations). Inese Čakstiņa has collaborated with scholars based in Latvia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Indriķis Muižnieks, Una Riekstiņa, Jānis Ancāns, Ruta Muceniece, Martin J. Hoogduijn, Vadims Parfejevs, Līga Stīpniece, Nityanand Jain, Jānis Ozoliņš and Jurijs Ozoliņš. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Molecular Biology, Cell Research and Journal of the European Ceramic Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.