Jurijs Ozoliņš

539 total citations
53 papers, 420 citations indexed

About

Jurijs Ozoliņš is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Building and Construction. According to data from OpenAlex, Jurijs Ozoliņš has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 420 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 12 papers in Materials Chemistry and 9 papers in Building and Construction. Recurrent topics in Jurijs Ozoliņš's work include Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (10 papers), Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production (7 papers) and Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers). Jurijs Ozoliņš is often cited by papers focused on Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (10 papers), Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production (7 papers) and Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers). Jurijs Ozoliņš collaborates with scholars based in Latvia, United Kingdom and Czechia. Jurijs Ozoliņš's co-authors include Andrei Shishkin, Līga Stīpniece, Jānis Ločs, Gaurav Goel, Līga Bērziņa-Cimdiņa, Māris Kļaviņš, Sergei Piskunov, Kristaps Rubenis, Yuri F. Zhukovskii and Dagnija Loča and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Cleaner Production and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Jurijs Ozoliņš

49 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jurijs Ozoliņš Latvia 14 128 95 75 67 65 53 420
Priyanka Singh India 8 82 0.6× 69 0.7× 96 1.3× 29 0.4× 122 1.9× 11 447
Wei Cheng Ng Singapore 12 286 2.2× 85 0.9× 42 0.6× 94 1.4× 81 1.2× 13 631
Abdulkarim S. Ahmed Nigeria 13 119 0.9× 165 1.7× 92 1.2× 81 1.2× 145 2.2× 38 525
Lan Tang China 11 267 2.1× 103 1.1× 33 0.4× 88 1.3× 75 1.2× 17 497
Noorina Hidayu Jamil Malaysia 11 116 0.9× 133 1.4× 98 1.3× 55 0.8× 50 0.8× 28 407
Lorena Iancu Romania 12 146 1.1× 96 1.0× 39 0.5× 171 2.6× 57 0.9× 59 584
Simona Tučkutė Lithuania 14 151 1.2× 267 2.8× 77 1.0× 46 0.7× 134 2.1× 62 704
Ramona Marina Grigorescu Romania 13 165 1.3× 98 1.0× 37 0.5× 179 2.7× 59 0.9× 57 604
Han Byul Song United States 12 102 0.8× 65 0.7× 50 0.7× 42 0.6× 33 0.5× 26 516
Piotr Sakiewicz Poland 12 93 0.7× 82 0.9× 51 0.7× 97 1.4× 186 2.9× 38 462

Countries citing papers authored by Jurijs Ozoliņš

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jurijs Ozoliņš's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jurijs Ozoliņš with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jurijs Ozoliņš more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jurijs Ozoliņš

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jurijs Ozoliņš. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jurijs Ozoliņš. The network helps show where Jurijs Ozoliņš may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jurijs Ozoliņš

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jurijs Ozoliņš. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jurijs Ozoliņš based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jurijs Ozoliņš. Jurijs Ozoliņš is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shishkin, Andrei, Д. В. Мірошниченко, Vita Šterna, et al.. (2025). Granulation and pyrolysis of agricultural residues for an enhanced circular economy. Results in Engineering. 26. 104919–104919. 5 indexed citations
2.
Shishkin, Andrei, Ilmārs Zālīte, Ashish Kumar Singh, et al.. (2023). Physical, Thermal, and Chemical Properties of Fly Ash Cenospheres Obtained from Different Sources. Materials. 16(5). 2035–2035. 19 indexed citations
3.
Lapkovskis, Vjačeslavs, et al.. (2022). Application of Granular Biocomposites Based on Homogenised Peat for Absorption of Oil Products. Materials. 15(4). 1306–1306. 4 indexed citations
4.
Goel, Gaurav, et al.. (2021). Using circular economy principles to recycle materials in guiding the design of a wet scrubber-reactor for indoor air disinfection from coronavirus and other pathogens. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 22. 101429–101429. 13 indexed citations
5.
Goel, Gaurav, et al.. (2020). Influence of waste glass in the foaming process of open cell porous ceramic as filtration media for industrial wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production. 282. 124546–124546. 18 indexed citations
6.
Ozoliņš, Jurijs, et al.. (2020). Recycled Paper Additive for Wood-Polymer Composite: Preparation and Characterization. Key engineering materials. 850. 81–86. 1 indexed citations
7.
Shishkin, Andrei, et al.. (2019). Clay Ceramic Hollow Sphere - Cement Syntactic Foam Composite for Building Applications. Key engineering materials. 800. 228–234. 10 indexed citations
8.
Ozoliņš, Jurijs, et al.. (2018). Additive Manufacturing and Casting Technology Comparison: Mechanical Properties, Productivity and Cost Benchmark. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences. 55(2). 56–63. 12 indexed citations
9.
Stīpniece, Līga, et al.. (2017). Electrically Active and 3D Porous TiO2-x Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration. publication.editionName. 833–840. 19 indexed citations
10.
Stīpniece, Līga, et al.. (2016). Novel Scaffolds based on Hydroxyapatite/Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Nanocomposite Coated Porous TiO2 Ceramics for Bone Tissue Engineering. publication.editionName. 1530–1537. 1 indexed citations
11.
Voļperts, Aleksandrs, et al.. (2016). Supercapacitor Electrodes from Activated Wood Charcoal. publication.editionName. 337–341. 3 indexed citations
12.
Ozoliņš, Jurijs, et al.. (2016). Properties of recycled polypropylene based composites incorporating treated hardwood sawdust. AIP conference proceedings. 1736. 20111–20111. 3 indexed citations
13.
Mežule, Linda, et al.. (2015). Disinfection Effect of Electrochemically Generated Chlorine on Surface Associated Escherichia Coli in a Drinking Water System. publication.editionName. 3704–3710. 1 indexed citations
14.
Ločs, Jānis, et al.. (2015). Apatite-forming ability of thermally treated titania with various phase compositions. Materials Letters. 146. 69–72. 7 indexed citations
15.
Ozoliņš, Jurijs, et al.. (2015). DIFFERENCE IN THE TREATMENT EFFECTIVENESS OF WOODWORKING WASTEWATER BETWEEN POLYALUMINIUM CHLORIDE-BASED COAGULANTS. Environment Technology Resources Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2. 64–70. 1 indexed citations
16.
Stīpniece, Līga, et al.. (2015). Novel scaffolds based on hydroxyapatite/poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite coated porous TiO 2 ceramics for bone tissue engineering. Ceramics International. 42(1). 1530–1537. 39 indexed citations
17.
Borodajenko, Natālija, et al.. (2014). Studies of TiO<sub>2</sub> Ceramics Structure after Thermal Treatment at Different Conditions. Key engineering materials. 604. 309–312. 5 indexed citations
18.
Ozoliņš, Jurijs, et al.. (2012). Solving Environmental Problems with Latvian Clay-Based Sorbents. 51(4). 389–397.
19.
Mežule, Linda, et al.. (2011). Model water disinfection with electrolysis using TinO2n-1 containing ceramic electrodes. 34–40. 5 indexed citations
20.
Ozoliņš, Jurijs, et al.. (2010). Preparation of water using electrochemical processes.. 1(1). 35–39. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026