Ines Schreiver

1.3k total citations
28 papers, 597 citations indexed

About

Ines Schreiver is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Clinical Psychology and Dermatology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ines Schreiver has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 597 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Cultural Studies, 23 papers in Clinical Psychology and 20 papers in Dermatology. Recurrent topics in Ines Schreiver's work include Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (27 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (23 papers) and Dermatologic Treatments and Research (10 papers). Ines Schreiver is often cited by papers focused on Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (27 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (23 papers) and Dermatologic Treatments and Research (10 papers). Ines Schreiver collaborates with scholars based in Germany, France and Netherlands. Ines Schreiver's co-authors include Andreas Luch, Peter Laux, Christian Seim, Bernhard Hesse, Stefan G. Amyotte, Petra M. Houterman, Lisong Ma, Martijn Rep, Sjef Boeren and Sarah M. Schmidt and has published in prestigious journals such as JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Scientific Reports and BMC Genomics.

In The Last Decade

Ines Schreiver

26 papers receiving 587 citations

Peers

Ines Schreiver
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Cultural Studies 333
  • Clinical Psychology 259
  • Dermatology 251
  • Plant Science 157
  • Cell Biology 151
Replace Karin Lehner with:
Karin Lehner Germany
Inger Dahlquist Sweden
Massimo Gola Italy
Katherine Nolan United States
Ken‐ichiro O’goshi Japan
A. Pons-Guiraud France
Jaishree Sharad India
Björn Edman Sweden
Deepashree Daulatabad India
Robert L. Burns United States
Karin Lehner Germany View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Ines Schreiver
Ines Schreiver · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Ines Schreiver
Ines Schreiver · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Schreiver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Schreiver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Schreiver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Schreiver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Schreiver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Schreiver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Schreiver. The network helps show where Ines Schreiver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ines Schreiver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ines Schreiver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ines Schreiver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ines Schreiver. Ines Schreiver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 1
4 1
5 16
6 4
7 2
8 0
9 4
10 12
11 44
12 46
13 3
14 51
15 2
16 18
17 12
18 81
19 32
20 164

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026