Inês Santos
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 2%
- Obesity and Health Practices
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 25
- Physiology 24
- Physical Activity and Health 16
- Diet and metabolism studies 6
- Co-authors
- Pedro J. Teixeira (20 shared papers)Eliana V. Carraça (16 shared papers)Marta M. Marques (9 shared papers)Falko F. Sniehotta (4 shared papers)Gonçalo V. Mendonça (5 shared papers)Pedro Pezarat‐Correia (4 shared papers)Marlene N. Silva (13 shared papers)Cláudia S. Minderico (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (3 papers)Obesity (3 papers)Nutrients (2 papers)Obesity Reviews (2 papers)Obesity Facts (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited KingdomDenmark
In The Last Decade
Inês Santos
56 papers receiving 816 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Pharmacy 148
- Applied Psychology 116
- Physiology 378
- Clinical Psychology 266
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 78
Countries citing papers authored by Inês Santos
This map shows the geographic impact of Inês Santos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inês Santos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inês Santos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inês Santos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inês Santos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inês Santos. The network helps show where Inês Santos may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inês Santos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 191 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 98 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 11 |
About Inês Santos
Inês Santos is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 64 papers that have together received 828 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (25 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (21 papers), Physical Activity and Health (16 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (8 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (6 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (5 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (148 citations), Applied Psychology (116 citations), Physiology (378 citations), Clinical Psychology (266 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (78 citations). Inês Santos has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Pedro J. Teixeira, Eliana V. Carraça, Marta M. Marques, Falko F. Sniehotta, Gonçalo V. Mendonça, Pedro Pezarat‐Correia, Marlene N. Silva, Cláudia S. Minderico, James O. Hill and Mary Yannakoulia. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Obesity, Nutrients, Obesity Reviews and Obesity Facts.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.