Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz

46 papers receiving 726 citations

Peers

Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Toxicology 289
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 134
  • Family Practice 36
  • Pharmacology 147
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 16
Replace Olivia Leoni with:
Olivia Leoni Italy
Yasser Alatawi Saudi Arabia
Madhan Ramesh India
Sarah McDowell United Kingdom
Randy C. Hatton United States
William N. Kelly United States
Jordan R. Covvey United States
Roberto Bonaiuti Italy
Emma Davies United Kingdom
Yogini Jani United Kingdom
Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz relative to Olivia Leoni Italy Olivia Leoni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Olivia Leoni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz. The network helps show where Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz Line = papers co-authored together Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020184
2 201262
3 201953
4 201652
5 201244
6 201338
7 201233
8
Estratégias para aumentar a sensibilidade da farmacovigilância em Portugal
201129
9 202428
10 201428
11 201820
12 201618
13 202114
14
[The Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System].
201313
15 201213
16 202212
17 201511
18 202410
19 20229
20 20228

About Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz

Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz is a scholar working on Toxicology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 55 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (28 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (12 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (11 papers), Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (8 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (7 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (6 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (6 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (289 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (134 citations), Family Practice (36 citations), Pharmacology (147 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (16 citations). Inês Ribeiro‐Vaz has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Jorge Polónia, Ricardo Cruz‐Correia, María Teresa Herdeiro, Altamiro Costa‐Pereira, Cristina Santos, Adolfo Figueiras, Eva Gómes, Andréia Teixeira, Matilde Monteiro‐Soares and Pascal Demoly. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Safety, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, Frontiers in Medicine, Expert Opinion on Drug Safety and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact