Emma Davies
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.5%
- Toxicology top 0.2%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- David R. MottramMunir PirmohamedChristopher F. GreenStephen TaylorPaula WilliamsonJennifer S. BartholomewDavid W. DenningPhilip Rowe
- Topics
- Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (7 papers)Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (6 papers)Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emma Davies
21 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 458
- Toxicology 440
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 342
- Economics and Econometrics 132
- Epidemiology 130
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Davies
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Davies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Davies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Davies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Davies
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Davies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Davies. The network helps show where Emma Davies may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Davies
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Davies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Davies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Davies. Emma Davies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 119 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 87 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospital In-Patients: A Prospective Analysis of 3695 Patient-Episodesbreakdown → | 525 |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 78 | |
| 15 | 67 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | An evaluation of the efficacy of using oocyte donors aged 36-39. | 1 |
| 18 | Improving physician-patient communication can increase success of rehabilitation. | 1 |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Emma Davies
Emma Davies is a scholar working on Toxicology, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Medical Laboratory Technology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (7 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (6 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (440 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (458 citations) and Family Practice (51 citations). Emma Davies has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David R. Mottram, Munir Pirmohamed, Christopher F. Green, Stephen Taylor, Paula Williamson, Jennifer S. Bartholomew, David W. Denning, Philip Rowe, Laura J. Balcer and Steven Galetta. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurology and Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.