Ines Heinen

609 total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 430 citations indexed

About

Ines Heinen is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ines Heinen has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 430 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ines Heinen's work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers) and Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (3 papers). Ines Heinen is often cited by papers focused on COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers) and Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (3 papers). Ines Heinen collaborates with scholars based in Germany. Ines Heinen's co-authors include Rüya‐Daniela Kocalevent, Monika Bullinger, Corinna Bergelt, Elmar Brähler, Markus Zenger, Oliver Decker, Sarah Dwinger, Andreas H. Guse, Gerhard Schön and Birgitt Wiese and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Ines Heinen

9 papers receiving 414 citations

Hit Papers

Perceived stress in first year medical students - associa... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ines Heinen Germany 8 234 222 122 95 54 10 430
W. David Robinson United States 11 119 0.5× 174 0.8× 71 0.6× 123 1.3× 53 1.0× 22 370
Lindsay Davis United States 5 385 1.6× 210 0.9× 177 1.5× 145 1.5× 46 0.9× 14 517
Ab Rahman Esa Malaysia 7 297 1.3× 246 1.1× 145 1.2× 106 1.1× 29 0.5× 13 431
Tiffany B. Brown United States 9 118 0.5× 221 1.0× 56 0.5× 84 0.9× 45 0.8× 18 416
Patrícia Lacerda Bellodi Brazil 12 222 0.9× 136 0.6× 126 1.0× 99 1.0× 34 0.6× 28 418
Hussam Aridi Lebanon 4 292 1.2× 186 0.8× 177 1.5× 81 0.9× 47 0.9× 7 437
Amy L. Stevens United States 11 175 0.7× 259 1.2× 39 0.3× 95 1.0× 110 2.0× 26 492
Isabel Cuéllar‐Flores Spain 14 85 0.4× 166 0.7× 82 0.7× 87 0.9× 39 0.7× 47 417
Billy Gazard United Kingdom 13 183 0.8× 231 1.0× 34 0.3× 133 1.4× 48 0.9× 14 477
Nicole Kitos United States 10 90 0.4× 160 0.7× 208 1.7× 35 0.4× 49 0.9× 12 392

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Heinen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Heinen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Heinen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Heinen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Heinen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Heinen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Heinen. The network helps show where Ines Heinen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ines Heinen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ines Heinen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ines Heinen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ines Heinen. Ines Heinen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
3.
Heinen, Ines, et al.. (2021). Understanding Mental Burden and Factors Associated With Study Worries Among Undergraduate Medical Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 734264–734264. 16 indexed citations
4.
Heinen, Ines, et al.. (2020). Perception of the study situation and mental burden during the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate medical students with and without mentoring. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 37(7). Doc72–Doc72. 24 indexed citations
5.
Bergelt, Corinna, et al.. (2017). Mentoring für Studierende in der Medizin. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz. 61(2). 210–217. 6 indexed citations
6.
Heinen, Ines, Monika Bullinger, & Rüya‐Daniela Kocalevent. (2017). Perceived stress in first year medical students - associations with personal resources and emotional distress. BMC Medical Education. 17(1). 4–4. 270 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Heinen, Ines, et al.. (2016). Effects of Mentoring Speed Dating as an Innovative Matching Tool in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Mixed Methods Study. PLoS ONE. 11(2). e0147444–e0147444. 28 indexed citations
8.
Kocalevent, Rüya‐Daniela, Markus Zenger, Ines Heinen, et al.. (2015). Resilience in the General Population: Standardization of the Resilience Scale (RS-11). PLoS ONE. 10(11). e0140322–e0140322. 39 indexed citations
9.
Heinen, Ines, Hendrik van den Bussche, Daniela Koller, et al.. (2014). Morbiditätsunterschiede bei Pflegebedürftigen in Abhängigkeit von Pflegesektor und Pflegestufe. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 48(3). 237–245. 8 indexed citations
10.
Bussche, Hendrik van den, Ines Heinen, Daniela Koller, et al.. (2013). Die Epidemiologie von chronischen Krankheiten und Pflegebedürftigkeit. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 47(5). 403–409. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026