Ines Heinen
Impact in
- General Dentistry top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Resilience and Mental Health
- Health and Well-being Studies
- Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Papers in
-
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 2
- Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies 2
- Resilience and Mental Health 1
-
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 3
- Co-authors
- Rüya‐Daniela Kocalevent (2 shared papers)Monika Bullinger (1 shared paper)Corinna Bergelt (4 shared papers)Oliver Decker (1 shared paper)Markus Zenger (1 shared paper)Sarah Dwinger (1 shared paper)Elmar Brähler (1 shared paper)Andreas H. Guse (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Medical Education (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)BMJ Open (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychology (1 paper)Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Ines Heinen
9 papers receiving 432 citations
Ines Heinen's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- General Dentistry 13
- Clinical Psychology 162
- General Health Professions 158
- Applied Psychology 20
- Social Psychology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Ines Heinen
This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Heinen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Heinen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Heinen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Heinen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Heinen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Heinen. The network helps show where Ines Heinen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Ines Heinen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perceived stress in first year medical students - associations with personal resources and emotional distress Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 284 |
| 2 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 0 |
About Ines Heinen
Ines Heinen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Social Psychology, General Dentistry and Applied Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Mentoring and Academic Development (2 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (2 papers), Dental Research and COVID-19 (1 paper), Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper), Diversity and Career in Medicine (1 paper) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Dentistry (13 citations), Clinical Psychology (162 citations), General Health Professions (158 citations), Applied Psychology (20 citations) and Social Psychology (71 citations). Ines Heinen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rüya‐Daniela Kocalevent, Monika Bullinger, Corinna Bergelt, Oliver Decker, Markus Zenger, Sarah Dwinger, Elmar Brähler, Andreas H. Guse, Birgitt Wiese and Heike Hansen. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Education, PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Frontiers in Psychology and Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.