Inés de Benito
About
In The Last Decade
Inés de Benito
6 papers receiving 272 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Epidemiology 136
- Clinical Biochemistry 131
- Molecular Medicine 93
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 63
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 63
Countries citing papers authored by Inés de Benito
This map shows the geographic impact of Inés de Benito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inés de Benito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inés de Benito more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inés de Benito
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inés de Benito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inés de Benito. The network helps show where Inés de Benito may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inés de Benito
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inés de Benito. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inés de Benito based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inés de Benito. Inés de Benito is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 46 | |
| 5 | 145 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.