Inês Baía

13 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Inês Baía
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 56
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 122
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 20
  • Reproductive Medicine 22
  • Pharmacology 30
Replace Roxana Behruzi with:
Roxana Behruzi Canada
Ximena García United States
Sigríður Sía Jónsdóttir Iceland
Sara Borrelli United Kingdom
Farzaneh Pazandeh Iran
Alane B. O’Connor United States
Nahla Abdel‐Tawab United States
Hülya Türkmen Türkiye
Priscilla Hall United States
Zahra Noorani Mejareh Iran
Inês Baía relative to Roxana Behruzi Canada Roxana Behruzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Roxana Behruzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inês Baía

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inês Baía's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inês Baía with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inês Baía more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inês Baía

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inês Baía. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inês Baía. The network helps show where Inês Baía may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Inês Baía, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inês Baía Line = papers co-authored together Inês Baía links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2016102
2 202048
3 202241
4 202010
5 20199
6 20198
7 20194
8 20194
9
Parental needs and stress in neonatal intensive care units: effect of data collection period
20153
10 20222
11 20202
12 20191
13 20151

About Inês Baía

Inês Baía is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (3 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (3 papers), COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (2 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (56 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (122 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (20 citations), Reproductive Medicine (22 citations) and Pharmacology (30 citations). Inês Baía has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues, Cláudia de Freitas, Susana Silva, Elisabete Alves, Mariana Amorim, Michelle Kelly‐Irving, Carina Rodrigues, Henrique Barros, Catarina Samorinha and Helena Machado. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Public Health, Sexuality Research and Social Policy, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care and Cadernos de Saúde Pública.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact