I.N.C. Lawes
Impact in
- Computational Mathematics top 10%
-
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 3
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 3
-
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments 5
- Gastrointestinal motility and disorders 4
- Co-authors
- Thomas R. Barrick (4 shared papers)Chris A. Clark (3 shared papers)Paul Andrews (8 shared papers)Natalia Spierings (1 shared paper)David R. Evans (1 shared paper)Vengadasalam Murugam (1 shared paper)Marie Song (1 shared paper)Clare E. Mackay (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Physiology (5 papers)Gut (2 papers)Neuroscience (1 paper)Cortex (1 paper)Cerebral Cortex (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandFrance
In The Last Decade
I.N.C. Lawes
18 papers receiving 706 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Computational Mathematics 11
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 365
- Gastroenterology 80
- Cognitive Neuroscience 292
- Neurology 59
Countries citing papers authored by I.N.C. Lawes
This map shows the geographic impact of I.N.C. Lawes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.N.C. Lawes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.N.C. Lawes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I.N.C. Lawes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.N.C. Lawes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.N.C. Lawes. The network helps show where I.N.C. Lawes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside I.N.C. Lawes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 271 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 141 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 117 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 34 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 33 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 30 | |
| 7 | 1982 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 17 | |
| 9 | Variation of the ferret skull (Mustela putorius furo L.) in relation to stereotaxic landmarks. | 1987 | 11 |
| 10 | 1986 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1985 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 10 | |
| 13 | 1978 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1980 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 17 | The neuroanatomy of the ferret brain | 1988 | 2 |
| 18 | 1987 | 1 |
About I.N.C. Lawes
I.N.C. Lawes is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Gastroenterology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology and Physiology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (5 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (4 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (2 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (11 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (365 citations), Gastroenterology (80 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (292 citations) and Neurology (59 citations). I.N.C. Lawes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and France. Frequent co-authors include Thomas R. Barrick, Chris A. Clark, Paul Andrews, Natalia Spierings, David R. Evans, Vengadasalam Murugam, Marie Song, Clare E. Mackay, Rebecca A. Charlton and Hugh S. Markus. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Gut, Neuroscience, Cortex and Cerebral Cortex.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.