Ina Huth
Impact in
-
- Ionic liquids properties and applications
- Environmental Engineering top 10%
- Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Papers in
-
- Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization 4
- Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 4
- Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry 1
-
- Biofuel production and bioconversion 2
- Catalysis for Biomass Conversion 2
- Co-authors
- Dirk Holtmann (6 shared papers)Anne Sydow (3 shared papers)Thomas Krieg (3 shared papers)Jens Schrader (4 shared papers)Selin Kara (1 shared paper)Andreas Liese (1 shared paper)Christoph Wittmann (1 shared paper)Rainer Krull (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Yeast (1 paper)Molecular Catalysis (1 paper)Engineering in Life Sciences (1 paper)Biotechnology Letters (1 paper)Journal of Biotechnology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Ina Huth
7 papers receiving 323 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Catalysis 52
- Environmental Engineering 103
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 82
- Filtration and Separation 10
- Process Chemistry and Technology 8
Countries citing papers authored by Ina Huth
This map shows the geographic impact of Ina Huth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ina Huth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ina Huth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ina Huth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ina Huth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ina Huth. The network helps show where Ina Huth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Ina Huth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 158 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 3 |
About Ina Huth
Ina Huth is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Biotechnology, Pharmacology and Biomaterials, having authored 7 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (4 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (4 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (2 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (2 papers), Biochemical and biochemical processes (1 paper), Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry (1 paper), Ionic liquids properties and applications (1 paper) and Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (52 citations), Environmental Engineering (103 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (82 citations), Filtration and Separation (10 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (8 citations). Ina Huth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Dirk Holtmann, Anne Sydow, Thomas Krieg, Jens Schrader, Selin Kara, Andreas Liese, Christoph Wittmann, Rainer Krull, M. M. W. Etschmann and Stéphane Guillouet. Their work appears in journals such as Yeast, Molecular Catalysis, Engineering in Life Sciences, Biotechnology Letters and Journal of Biotechnology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.