Imad M. Ali
About
In The Last Decade
Imad M. Ali
7 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Epidemiology 256
- Emergency Medicine 158
- Neurology 138
- Clinical Psychology 82
- Psychiatry and Mental health 65
Countries citing papers authored by Imad M. Ali
This map shows the geographic impact of Imad M. Ali's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Imad M. Ali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imad M. Ali more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Imad M. Ali
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Imad M. Ali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Imad M. Ali. The network helps show where Imad M. Ali may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Imad M. Ali
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Imad M. Ali. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Imad M. Ali based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Imad M. Ali. Imad M. Ali is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | Dengue virus epidemics: A recent report of 2018 from district Swat, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan | 3 |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 304 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.