Ilya V. Vikhrev
- Ecology top 1%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Oceanography top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ivan N. BolotovMikhail Y. GofarovAlexander V. KondakovEkaterina S. KonoplevaYulia V. BespalayaOlga V. AksenovaSakboworn TumpeesuwanAlena A. Tomilova
- Topics
- Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (79 papers)Mollusks and Parasites Studies (28 papers)Fish Ecology and Management Studies (24 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- RussiaUnited KingdomPortugal
In The Last Decade
Ilya V. Vikhrev
84 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Ecology 1.2k
- Insect Science 492
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 442
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 152
- Oceanography 137
Countries citing papers authored by Ilya V. Vikhrev
This map shows the geographic impact of Ilya V. Vikhrev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ilya V. Vikhrev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ilya V. Vikhrev more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ilya V. Vikhrev
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ilya V. Vikhrev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ilya V. Vikhrev. The network helps show where Ilya V. Vikhrev may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ilya V. Vikhrev
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ilya V. Vikhrev. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ilya V. Vikhrev based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ilya V. Vikhrev. Ilya V. Vikhrev is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 72 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About Ilya V. Vikhrev
Ilya V. Vikhrev is a scholar working on Ecology, Insect Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (79 papers), Mollusks and Parasites Studies (28 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (1.2k citations), Insect Science (492 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (442 citations). Ilya V. Vikhrev has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, United Kingdom and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Ivan N. Bolotov, Mikhail Y. Gofarov, Alexander V. Kondakov, Ekaterina S. Konopleva, Yulia V. Bespalaya, Olga V. Aksenova, Sakboworn Tumpeesuwan, Alena A. Tomilova, Manuel Lopes‐Lima and Maxim V. Vinarski. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.