Ilya Sh. Averbukh
-
- Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications 87
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies 41
- Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies 34
- Quantum optics and atomic interactions 20
- Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates 19
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies 13
- Spectroscopy top 0.5%
- Molecular spectroscopy and chirality 15
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics top 10%
- Biophysics top 5%
-
- Quantum Information and Cryptography 13
Ilya Sh. Averbukh
114 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 3.5k
- Spectroscopy 1.1k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 396
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 14
- Biophysics 86
Countries citing papers authored by Ilya Sh. Averbukh
This map shows the geographic impact of Ilya Sh. Averbukh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ilya Sh. Averbukh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ilya Sh. Averbukh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ilya Sh. Averbukh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ilya Sh. Averbukh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ilya Sh. Averbukh. The network helps show where Ilya Sh. Averbukh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ilya Sh. Averbukh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 61 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 51 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 43 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 81 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 214 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 159 | |
| 20 | Fractional regenerations of wave packets in the course of long-term evolution of highly excited quantum systems | 1989 | 3 |
About Ilya Sh. Averbukh
Ilya Sh. Averbukh is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 120 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (87 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (41 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (34 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (20 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (19 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (15 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (13 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (3.5k citations), Spectroscopy (1.1k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (396 citations). Ilya Sh. Averbukh has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include N. F. Perel'Man, Yehiam Prior, Erez Gershnabel, M. Leibscher, Herschel Rabitz, Sharly Fleischer, C. Leichtle, Johannes Floß, R. Arvieu and Wolfgang P. Schleich. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and The Journal of Chemical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.