Ih‐Sheng Chen
- Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 43
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 23
- Fungal Biology and Applications 18
- Toxicology top 1%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 23
- Fungal Biology and Applications 18
- Biotechnology top 2%
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 34
- Phytochemical compounds biological activities 17
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 26
- Plant chemical constituents analysis 17
-
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 16
- Co-authors
- Ian‐Lih TsaiMing‐Jen ChengHsun‐Shuo ChangChe‐Ming TengTsutomu IshikawaJih‐Jung ChenChang‐Yih DuhChien‐Fang Peng
- Cited by
- BiochemistryPharmacologyToxicology
- Partner nations
- TaiwanJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ih‐Sheng Chen
161 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Biochemistry 667
- Pharmacology 624
- Toxicology 145
- Pharmacology 661
- Biotechnology 296
Countries citing papers authored by Ih‐Sheng Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Ih‐Sheng Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ih‐Sheng Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ih‐Sheng Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ih‐Sheng Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ih‐Sheng Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ih‐Sheng Chen. The network helps show where Ih‐Sheng Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ih‐Sheng Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 6 | Secondary Metabolites and Bioactivity of the Endophytic Fungus Phomopsis theicola from Taiwanese endemic plant | 2016 | 3 |
| 7 | New Chemical Constituents from the Endophytic Fungus Xylariapapulis Cultivated on Taiwanese Lepidagathisstenophylla | 2016 | 12 |
| 8 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 35 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 75 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 23 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 2 |
About Ih‐Sheng Chen
Ih‐Sheng Chen is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Horticulture, having authored 164 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (43 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (34 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (26 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (23 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (18 papers), Plant chemical constituents analysis (17 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (17 papers) and Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (667 citations), Pharmacology (624 citations) and Toxicology (145 citations). Ih‐Sheng Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ian‐Lih Tsai, Ming‐Jen Cheng, Hsun‐Shuo Chang, Che‐Ming Teng, Tsutomu Ishikawa, Jih‐Jung Chen, Chang‐Yih Duh, Chien‐Fang Peng, Gwo‐Fang Yuan and Ming‐Der Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Journal of Natural Products, Planta Medica, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.