Ming‐Jen Cheng
- Biochemistry top 0.5%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 74
- Horticulture top 2%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 88
- Fungal Biology and Applications 59
- Biotechnology top 1%
- Microbial Metabolism and Applications 45
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products 22
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 88
- Fungal Biology and Applications 59
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 52
- Phytochemical compounds biological activities 32
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 38
Ming‐Jen Cheng
247 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Biochemistry 599
- Horticulture 59
- Pharmacology 533
- Biotechnology 498
- Pharmacology 811
Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Jen Cheng
This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Jen Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Jen Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Jen Cheng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Jen Cheng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Jen Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Jen Cheng. The network helps show where Ming‐Jen Cheng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Jen Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 18 | Secondary Metabolites and Bioactivity of the Endophytic Fungus Phomopsis theicola from Taiwanese endemic plant | 2016 | 3 |
| 19 | New Chemical Constituents from the Endophytic Fungus Xylariapapulis Cultivated on Taiwanese Lepidagathisstenophylla | 2016 | 12 |
| 20 | Chemical Constituents from the Leaves of Machilus zuihoensis Hayata var. mushaensis | 2009 | 1 |
About Ming‐Jen Cheng
Ming‐Jen Cheng is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Pharmacology, having authored 281 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (88 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (74 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (59 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (52 papers), Microbial Metabolism and Applications (45 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (38 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (32 papers) and Marine Sponges and Natural Products (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (599 citations), Horticulture (59 citations) and Pharmacology (533 citations). Ming‐Jen Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jih‐Jung Chen, Ih‐Sheng Chen, Ming‐Der Wu, Ian‐Lih Tsai, Hsun‐Shuo Chang, Gwo‐Fang Yuan, Ih‐Sheng Chen, Ih-Sheng Chen, Ping‐Jyun Sung and Chien‐Fang Peng. Their work appears in journals such as Molecules, Chemistry & Biodiversity, Phytochemistry Letters, Helvetica Chimica Acta and Phytochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.