I.F. Russell

3.1k total citations
73 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

I.F. Russell is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, I.F. Russell has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Surgery, 26 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 22 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Recurrent topics in I.F. Russell's work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (35 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (24 papers) and Nausea and vomiting management (11 papers). I.F. Russell is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Pain Management (35 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (24 papers) and Nausea and vomiting management (11 papers). I.F. Russell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. I.F. Russell's co-authors include S. W. Lindow, Stephen W. Lindow, W. A. Chambers, Makani Purva, James J. Walker, Derek Tuffnell, G. Lyons, Gerald Mason, M. Vucevic and Zubaid Rafique and has published in prestigious journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, British Journal of Anaesthesia and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

In The Last Decade

I.F. Russell

71 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
I.F. Russell United Kingdom 26 978 566 519 272 250 73 1.7k
Giorgio Capogna Italy 24 1.4k 1.4× 569 1.0× 382 0.7× 256 0.9× 181 0.7× 82 1.7k
Suzanne E. Rapp United States 15 832 0.9× 639 1.1× 292 0.6× 149 0.5× 19 0.1× 30 1.2k
Gershon Levinson United States 16 739 0.8× 325 0.6× 396 0.8× 331 1.2× 192 0.8× 26 1.3k
Mrinalini Balki Canada 28 1.2k 1.2× 392 0.7× 479 0.9× 906 3.3× 762 3.0× 113 2.4k
John E. Tetzlaff United States 28 1.4k 1.5× 359 0.6× 425 0.8× 118 0.4× 18 0.1× 106 2.2k
Krzysztof M. Kuczkowski United States 18 536 0.5× 155 0.3× 221 0.4× 342 1.3× 182 0.7× 113 1.3k
Shireen Ahmad United States 20 901 0.9× 383 0.7× 434 0.8× 60 0.2× 22 0.1× 35 1.7k
Robert R. Gaiser United States 20 742 0.8× 195 0.3× 182 0.4× 175 0.6× 137 0.5× 84 1.1k
Tytti Raudaskoski Finland 21 522 0.5× 236 0.4× 88 0.2× 752 2.8× 686 2.7× 39 1.7k
Mona Abdalla United Kingdom 12 1.1k 1.1× 472 0.8× 297 0.6× 398 1.5× 480 1.9× 14 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by I.F. Russell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.F. Russell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.F. Russell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.F. Russell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.F. Russell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.F. Russell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.F. Russell. The network helps show where I.F. Russell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I.F. Russell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I.F. Russell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I.F. Russell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I.F. Russell. I.F. Russell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pandit, Jaideep J., I.F. Russell, & M. Wang. (2015). Interpretations of responses using the isolated forearm technique in general anaesthesia: a debate. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 115. i32–i45. 17 indexed citations
2.
Ahmed, Imtiaz, et al.. (2014). Post-dural puncture headache and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a misdiagnosis or co-presentation?. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 23(3). 279–282. 23 indexed citations
3.
Russell, I.F., et al.. (2013). Assessing blocks after spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: how different questions affect findings from the same stimulus. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 22(4). 294–297. 12 indexed citations
4.
Hood, Kerenza, Michael Robling, David K. Ingledew, et al.. (2012). Mode of data elicitation, acquisition and response to surveys: a systematic review.. Health Technology Assessment. 16(27). 1–162. 32 indexed citations
5.
Russell, I.F.. (2011). A prospective controlled study of continuous spinal analgesia versus repeat epidural analgesia after accidental dural puncture in labour. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 21(1). 7–16. 60 indexed citations
6.
Russell, I.F.. (2010). Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 104(2). 270–270. 38 indexed citations
7.
Russell, I.F., et al.. (2009). Low-dose epidural top up for emergency caesarean delivery: a randomised comparison of levobupivacaine versus lidocaine/epinephrine/fentanyl. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 18(4). 335–341. 11 indexed citations
8.
Purva, Makani, et al.. (2009). A double blind comparison of the variability of block levels assessed using a hand help Neurotip™ or a Neuropen® at elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 19(1). 61–66. 3 indexed citations
9.
Pandey, Uma, I.F. Russell, & S. W. Lindow. (2006). How competent are obstetric and gynaecology trainees in managing maternal cardiac arrests?. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 26(6). 507–508. 4 indexed citations
11.
12.
Tuffnell, Derek, Stephen W. Lindow, G. Lyons, et al.. (2005). Outcomes of severe pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia in Yorkshire 1999/2003. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 112(7). 875–880. 122 indexed citations
13.
Russell, I.F., et al.. (2000). Caesarean section for placenta praevia: a retrospective study of anaesthetic management. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 84(6). 725–730. 70 indexed citations
14.
Russell, I.F., et al.. (2000). Comparison of intubating conditions following propofol and succinylcholine with propofol and remifentanil 2 μg kg −1 or 4 μg kg −1. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 85(4). 623–625. 41 indexed citations
15.
Hopkinson, John, et al.. (1997). A comparative multicentre trial of spinal needles for Caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 52(10). 1005–1011. 37 indexed citations
16.
Russell, I.F., et al.. (1995). Epidural clonidine-fentanyl combination for labour analgesia: a comparison with bupivacaine-fentanyl. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 4(3). 150–154. 6 indexed citations
17.
Russell, I.F.. (1995). Levels of anaesthesia and intraoperative pain at caesarean section under regional block. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 4(2). 71–77. 93 indexed citations
18.
Sheldon, T., Nick Freemantle, Jeremy Grimshaw, & I.F. Russell. (1994). Guidelines. The good guide to guides.. PubMed. 104(5432). 34–5. 1 indexed citations
19.
Russell, I.F.. (1993). MIDAZOLAM–ALFENTANIL: AN ANAESTHETIC? AN INVESTIGATION USING THE ISOLATED FOREARM TECHNIQUE. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 70(1). 42–46. 61 indexed citations
20.
Russell, I.F.. (1991). Statistics--with confidence?. British Journal of General Practice. 41(346). 179–80. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026