Ido Golding
Impact in
- Biophysics top 0.2%
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Modeling and Simulation top 1%
Papers in
- Biophysics 14
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 12
- Co-authors
- Edward C. CoxJohan PaulssonÁlvaro SánchezLeonardo A. SepúlvedaSamuel O. SkinnerHeng XuChenghang ZongEshel Ben‐Jacob
- Journals
- Biophysical Journal (6 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (5 papers)Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (3 papers)Science (3 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ido Golding
68 papers receiving 5.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Biophysics 649
- Modeling and Simulation 344
- Genetics 1.6k
- Molecular Biology 3.6k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 454
Countries citing papers authored by Ido Golding
This map shows the geographic impact of Ido Golding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ido Golding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ido Golding more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ido Golding
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ido Golding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ido Golding. The network helps show where Ido Golding may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ido Golding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 87 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 87 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 47 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 234 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 16 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 121 |
About Ido Golding
Ido Golding is a scholar working on Biophysics, Structural Biology, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (25 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (22 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (19 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (12 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (12 papers), Diffusion and Search Dynamics (8 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (5 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (649 citations), Modeling and Simulation (344 citations), Genetics (1.6k citations), Molecular Biology (3.6k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (454 citations). Ido Golding has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Edward C. Cox, Johan Paulsson, Álvaro Sánchez, Leonardo A. Sepúlveda, Samuel O. Skinner, Heng Xu, Chenghang Zong, Eshel Ben‐Jacob, Ronen Segev and Yann R. Chemla. Their work appears in journals such as Biophysical Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Science and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.