Ian J. Wright
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.01%
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 99
- Forest ecology and management 31
- Ecological Modeling top 0.1%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 14
- Global and Planetary Change top 0.05%
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 90
-
- Plant and animal studies 35
- Soil Science top 0.2%
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics 13
-
- Plant responses to elevated CO2 26
- Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement 14
- Co-authors
- Mark WestobyPeter B. ReichDaniel S. FalsterÜlo NiinemetsDavid I. WartonHendrik PoorterRafael VillarJacek Oleksyn
- Journals
- New Phytologist (28 papers)Functional Ecology (16 papers)Global Ecology and Biogeography (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ian J. Wright
178 papers receiving 27.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 16.1k
- Ecological Modeling 2.7k
- Global and Planetary Change 12.1k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 9.0k
- Soil Science 2.8k
Countries citing papers authored by Ian J. Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian J. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian J. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian J. Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian J. Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian J. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian J. Wright. The network helps show where Ian J. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian J. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 39 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 79 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 88 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 57 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 69 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 44 | |
| 19 | Global climatic drivers of leaf sizebreakdown → | 2017 | 647 |
| 20 | 2015 | 142 |
About Ian J. Wright
Ian J. Wright is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecological Modeling, having authored 184 papers that have together received 28.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (99 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (90 papers), Plant and animal studies (35 papers), Forest ecology and management (31 papers), Plant responses to elevated CO2 (26 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers), Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement (14 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (16.1k citations), Ecological Modeling (2.7k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (12.1k citations). Ian J. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Westoby, Peter B. Reich, Daniel S. Falster, Ülo Niinemets, David I. Warton, Hendrik Poorter, Rafael Villar, Jacek Oleksyn, Lourens Poorter and Angela T. Moles. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, Functional Ecology, Global Ecology and Biogeography, Annals of Botany and Plant and Soil.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.