Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population
2001534 citationsJason Porter, Antonio Guirao et al.Journal of the Optical Society of America Aprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Cox more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Cox. The network helps show where Ian Cox may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Cox
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Cox.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Cox based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Cox. Ian Cox is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Huxlin, Krystel R., Jonathan Ellis, Wayne H. Knox, et al.. (2019). Next generation diffractive multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia correction using LIRIC. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(9). 3723–3723.2 indexed citations
Cox, Ian, et al.. (2012). Understanding Lens Shape Dynamics During Off-Eye Dehydration of Contact Lens Materials with Varying Water Content. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53(14). 6104–6104.2 indexed citations
5.
Cox, Ian, et al.. (2009). Area Under the Modular Transfer Function Curve Does Not Predict Convolved E Image Quality. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 1554–1554.1 indexed citations
6.
Sabesan, Ramkumar, et al.. (2006). Correcting Higher Order Aberrations Using Customized Soft Contact Lenses In Keratoconic Eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 1205–1205.4 indexed citations
Yoon, Geunyoung, et al.. (2005). Role of Spherical Aberration on Refractive Outcome After Custom LASIK Procedure. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 46(13). 4362–4362.1 indexed citations
Cox, Ian, et al.. (2004). The thickness profile of corneal flaps created with a microkeratome using real–time optical coherence tomography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 191–191.1 indexed citations
12.
Cox, Ian, et al.. (2004). What Causes The Increase in Higher Order Aberrations After LASIK? The Cut, The Flap Manipulation and/or the Ablation?. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 211–211.1 indexed citations
13.
Jeong, Tae Moon, Geunyoung Yoon, David R. Williams, & Ian Cox. (2004). Vision improvement using customized optics in normal and abnormal eyes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 1078–1078.1 indexed citations
Thomas, Joseph, J. Wang, Ian Cox, & Andrew M. Rollins. (2003). Central Corneal Epithelial and Flap Thickness after LASIK Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography(OCT) at 1310nm. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 2639–2639.1 indexed citations
16.
Yoon, Geunyoung, et al.. (2003). Spherical Aberration Induced by Refractive Surgery. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 2092–2092.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.