Iain M. McNicol
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Environmental Engineering top 10%
- Forestry top 2%
- Co-authors
- Casey M. RyanEdward T. A. MitchardMathew WilliamsRose PritchardJanet FisherMatthew OwenCaroline E. R. LehmannAndreas de Neergaard
- Topics
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (7 papers)Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (7 papers)Forest Management and Policy (6 papers)
- Journals
- Nature CommunicationsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesEcological Applications
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPeruGabon
In The Last Decade
Iain M. McNicol
20 papers receiving 490 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Global and Planetary Change 338
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 165
- Ecology 129
- Environmental Engineering 92
- Forestry 87
Countries citing papers authored by Iain M. McNicol
This map shows the geographic impact of Iain M. McNicol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iain M. McNicol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iain M. McNicol more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Iain M. McNicol
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iain M. McNicol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iain M. McNicol. The network helps show where Iain M. McNicol may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Iain M. McNicol
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Iain M. McNicol. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Iain M. McNicol based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Iain M. McNicol. Iain M. McNicol is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 99 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | Reconciling forest conservation with food production in sub-Saharan Africa: case studies from Ethiopia, Ghana and Tanzania. | 8 |
| 18 | 135 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About Iain M. McNicol
Iain M. McNicol is a scholar working on Forestry, Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 502 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (7 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (7 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (87 citations), Global and Planetary Change (338 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (165 citations). Iain M. McNicol has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Peru and Gabon. Frequent co-authors include Casey M. Ryan, Edward T. A. Mitchard, Mathew Williams, Rose Pritchard, Janet Fisher, Matthew Owen, Caroline E. R. Lehmann, Andreas de Neergaard, Nicholas Berry and Kyle G. Dexter. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Ecological Applications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.