Iago Porto-Díaz
About
In The Last Decade
Iago Porto-Díaz
4 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Artificial Intelligence 181
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 81
- Molecular Biology 66
- Information Systems 34
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 22
Countries citing papers authored by Iago Porto-Díaz
This map shows the geographic impact of Iago Porto-Díaz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iago Porto-Díaz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iago Porto-Díaz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Iago Porto-Díaz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iago Porto-Díaz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iago Porto-Díaz. The network helps show where Iago Porto-Díaz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Iago Porto-Díaz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Iago Porto-Díaz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Iago Porto-Díaz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Iago Porto-Díaz. Iago Porto-Díaz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 210 | |
| 2 | 60 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.