Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
HyperLEDA. III. The catalogue of extragalactic distances
2014525 citationsD. I. Makarov, P. Prugniel et al.Astronomy and Astrophysicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of I. Vauglin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Vauglin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Vauglin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Vauglin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Vauglin. The network helps show where I. Vauglin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. Vauglin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. Vauglin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. Vauglin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with I. Vauglin. I. Vauglin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Makarov, D. I., P. Prugniel, Nataliya Terekhova, H. M. Courtois, & I. Vauglin. (2014). HyperLEDA. III. The catalogue of extragalactic distances. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 570. A13–A13.525 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Moretto, Gil, N. Epchtein, M. Langlois, & I. Vauglin. (2012). An off-axis telescope concept for Antarctic astronomy. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8444. 84445E–84445E.2 indexed citations
3.
Koleva, M., Antoine Bouchard, P. Prugniel, S. De Rijcke, & I. Vauglin. (2012). The transmutation of dwarf galaxies: stellar populations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 428(4). 2949–2965.25 indexed citations
Koleva, M., Ph. Prugniel, & I. Vauglin. (2011). CRAL-2010 A Universe of Dwarf Galaxies. EAS Publications Series. 48.3 indexed citations
6.
Epchtein, N., Wolfgang R. Ansorge, M. Langlois, et al.. (2011). A project for an infrared synoptic survey from Antarctica with the Polar Large Telescope (PLT). 107–110.
Billebaud, F., et al.. (2000). Seasonal effects in the thermal structure of Saturn's stratosphere from infrared imaging at 10 microns. A&A. 356. 347–356.9 indexed citations
13.
Giard, M., et al.. (1999). GRAIN POPULATIONS IN THE M 17 SOUTH-WEST STAR FORMING COMPLEX. 352(1). 277–286.1 indexed citations
14.
Vauglin, I., G. Paturel, J. Borsenberger, et al.. (1999). First DENIS I-band extragalactic catalog. Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series. 135(1). 133–144.8 indexed citations
Davoust, E., G. Paturel, & I. Vauglin. (1985). Catalogue of central velocity dispersions of galaxies. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 61(2). 273–290.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.