Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Isolated Single Coronary Artery: Diagnosis, Angiographic Classification, and Clinical Significance
1979339 citationsMartin J. Lipton, William H. Barry et al.Radiologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of I Obrez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I Obrez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I Obrez more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I Obrez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I Obrez. The network helps show where I Obrez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of I Obrez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I Obrez.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I Obrez based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with I Obrez. I Obrez is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kosák, Mikuláš, et al.. (1987). [The world's first successful autotransplantation of the heart for recurrent tumor].. PubMed. 34(2). 131–9.1 indexed citations
3.
Pavčnik, Dušan, et al.. (1987). Renal cyst: Treatment with alcohol. 21(4). 361–364.7 indexed citations
4.
Obrez, I, et al.. (1985). Acute effects of sublingual nifedipine on segmental and global left ventricular function in coronary artery disease; an angiographic study.. PubMed. 74(11). 633–8.
5.
Obrez, I, et al.. (1985). Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty: follow up studies on renovascular hypertension.. PubMed. 42(3). 342–4.3 indexed citations
6.
Lipton, Martin J., William H. Barry, I Obrez, James F. Silverman, & Lewis Wexler. (1979). Isolated Single Coronary Artery: Diagnosis, Angiographic Classification, and Clinical Significance. Radiology. 130(1). 39–47.339 indexed citations breakdown →
Obrez, I, et al.. (1974). Coronary artery fistula: diagnosis and evaluation by selective contrast and radioisotopic coronary arteriography.. PubMed. 25(4). 310–5.1 indexed citations
Obrez, I, et al.. (1971). [Determination of the location of hemorrhage by selective angiography in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome].. PubMed. 25(2). 207–13.1 indexed citations
12.
Auersperg, M., et al.. (1971). Radioactive isotopes in the control of intraarterial chemotherapy.. PubMed. 12(2). 219–25.1 indexed citations
13.
Auersperg, M., Marija Us‐Krašovec, & I Obrez. (1969). Problems in intraarterial chemotherapy. I. Drug dilution.. PubMed. 16(5). 579–83.1 indexed citations
Obrez, I. (1965). [Angiographic diagnostic examination of abdominal organs using Seldinger's method].. PubMed. 34(3). 50–6.1 indexed citations
16.
Obrez, I. (1964). [SERIAL CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY WITH AN IMPROVIZED CASETTE--OUR EXPERIENCES].. PubMed. 33. 13–5.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.