I. M. PIPER

728 citations
3 papers · 585 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

    • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
    • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
    • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neurology top 10%
    • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Papers in

I. M. PIPER

3 papers receiving 559 citations

Hit Papers

Technetium-99m d,l-HM-PAO: a new radiopharmaceutical for SPECT imaging of regional cerebral blood perfusion. 1987 · 407 citations
4070+13+26Years since publication100200300400

Peers

I. M. PIPER
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 362
  • Neurology 114
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 70
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 110
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 51
Replace Lewis R. Canning with:
Lewis R. Canning United Kingdom
D.E. Kuhl United States
Thomas Hill United States
H Trojan Germany
Tachio Sato Japan
Jeffrey A. Clanton United States
Jeffrey Billings United States
J. Locher Switzerland
G.‐J. Meyer Germany
T C Hill United States
I. M. PIPER relative to Lewis R. Canning United Kingdom Lewis R. Canning's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lewis R. Canning · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. M. PIPER

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. M. PIPER's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. M. PIPER with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. M. PIPER more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. M. PIPER

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. M. PIPER. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. M. PIPER. The network helps show where I. M. PIPER may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside I. M. PIPER, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. M. PIPER Line = papers co-authored together I. M. PIPER links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown
#Work
1
Technetium-99m d,l-HM-PAO: a new radiopharmaceutical for SPECT imaging of regional cerebral blood perfusion.
Hit paper breakdown →
1987407
2 198598
3 198580

About I. M. PIPER

I. M. PIPER is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Materials Chemistry, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 3 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (2 papers) and Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (362 citations), Neurology (114 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (70 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (110 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (51 citations). I. M. PIPER has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include R.D. Pickett, Richard A. Holmes, Lewis R. Canning, R.D. Neirinckx, David P. Nowotnik, Wynn A. Volkert, A. Förster, B Higley, D.E. Troutner and Timothy J. Hoffman. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Medicine Communications and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact