I. M. Marks

12.2k citations
116 papers · 8.8k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 51

I. M. Marks

113 papers receiving 7.7k citations

Hit Papers

Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients1.5k197920261994201050010001.5k

Peers

I. M. Marks
Comparison fields: 5 of 194
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 4.0k
  • Clinical Psychology 5.5k
  • Applied Psychology 914
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 2.1k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
Replace Michael Gelder with:
Michael Gelder United Kingdom
Steven Reiss United States
Donald M. Quinlan United States
Samuel M. Turner United States
Warren Mansell United Kingdom
S. Rachman Canada
Rick E. Ingram United States
Larry W. Thompson United States
Paula Truax United States
W. Edward Craighead United States
I. M. Marks relative to Michael Gelder United Kingdom Michael Gelder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Michael Gelder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. M. Marks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. M. Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. M. Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. M. Marks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. M. Marks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. M. Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. M. Marks. The network helps show where I. M. Marks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. M. Marks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. M. Marks Line = papers co-authored together I. M. Marks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200663
2 200237
3 199921
4 199915
5 199613
6 199489
7 1994101
8 19947
9 199425
10 199126
11 198811
12 1988100
13 1988151
14 1987166
15 198711
16 19877
17 198713
18 198556
19 197634
20 197527

About I. M. Marks

I. M. Marks is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 116 papers that have together received 8.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (39 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (30 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (13 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (12 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (11 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (10 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (4.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (5.5k citations), Applied Psychology (914 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (2.1k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations). I. M. Marks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include A Mathews, Michael Gelder, J. Connolly, R. S. Stern, Ray Hodgson, J. P. Watson, D. Mawson, Homa Noshirvani, Bernard Audini and M. Muijen. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Psychological Medicine, American Journal of Psychiatry and Behavior Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026