I. Grotova

642 total citations
9 papers, 175 citations indexed

About

I. Grotova is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, I. Grotova has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 175 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 1 paper in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in I. Grotova's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (8 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (5 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (5 papers). I. Grotova is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (8 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (5 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (5 papers). I. Grotova collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Chile. I. Grotova's co-authors include A. Malyali, A. Rau, A. Merloni, M. Krumpe, D. Homan, Teng Liu, G. E. Anderson, J. C. A. Miller‐Jones, A J Goodwin and Johannes Büchner and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Astronomy and Astrophysics and The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

In The Last Decade

I. Grotova

8 papers receiving 109 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
I. Grotova Germany 7 155 57 15 14 8 9 175
D. Homan Germany 8 140 0.9× 49 0.9× 10 0.7× 16 1.1× 6 0.8× 15 162
A. Malyali Germany 8 230 1.5× 88 1.5× 21 1.4× 23 1.6× 8 1.0× 16 258
P. Charalampopoulos Denmark 7 138 0.9× 31 0.5× 16 1.1× 10 0.7× 5 0.6× 14 154
Erica Hammerstein United States 8 215 1.4× 61 1.1× 13 0.9× 19 1.4× 7 0.9× 13 242
A J Goodwin Australia 12 332 2.1× 94 1.6× 42 2.8× 25 1.8× 5 0.6× 27 352
Zhenfeng Sheng China 10 216 1.4× 61 1.1× 16 1.1× 32 2.3× 2 0.3× 16 231
G. Cannizzaro Netherlands 7 180 1.2× 36 0.6× 21 1.4× 8 0.6× 3 0.4× 10 186
S. Ascenzi Italy 8 196 1.3× 67 1.2× 19 1.3× 6 0.4× 2 0.3× 11 200
Y. Cendes United States 10 277 1.8× 147 2.6× 15 1.0× 8 0.6× 3 0.4× 16 289
Adam Kobelski United States 5 101 0.7× 17 0.3× 17 1.1× 8 0.6× 16 2.0× 19 103

Countries citing papers authored by I. Grotova

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Grotova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Grotova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Grotova more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Grotova

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Grotova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Grotova. The network helps show where I. Grotova may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. Grotova

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. Grotova. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. Grotova based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. Grotova. I. Grotova is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Böller, Thomas, F. Haberl, Chandreyee Maitra, et al.. (2025). The eROSITA DR1 variability catalogue. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 700. A61–A61.
2.
Liu, Teng, Taeho Ryu, Andrew Goodwin, et al.. (2024). Rapid evolution of the recurrence time in the repeating partial tidal disruption event eRASSt J045650.3−203750. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 683. L13–L13. 15 indexed citations
3.
Malyali, A., A. Rau, Clément Bonnerot, et al.. (2024). Transient fading X-ray emission detected during the optical rise of a tidal disruption event. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 531(1). 1256–1275. 7 indexed citations
4.
Homan, D., M. Gromadzki, Hartmut Winkler, et al.. (2024). An X-ray flaring event and a variable soft X-ray excess in the Seyfert LCRS B040659.9–385922 as detected with eROSITA. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 691. A102–A102. 2 indexed citations
5.
Goodwin, A J, G. E. Anderson, J. C. A. Miller‐Jones, et al.. (2024). A radio flare associated with the nuclear transient eRASSt J234403−352640: an outflow launched by a potential tidal disruption event. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 528(4). 7123–7136. 7 indexed citations
6.
Malyali, A., A. Rau, I. Grotova, et al.. (2023). The rebrightening of aROSAT-selected tidal disruption event: repeated weak partial disruption flares from a quiescent galaxy?. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 520(3). 3549–3559. 35 indexed citations
7.
Malyali, A., Zhi Liu, A. Merloni, et al.. (2023). eRASSt J074426.3 + 291606: prompt accretion disc formation in a ‘faint and slow’ tidal disruption event. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 520(3). 4209–4225. 10 indexed citations
8.
Wevers, T., Eric R. Coughlin, Dheeraj R. Pasham, et al.. (2023). Live to Die Another Day: The Rebrightening of AT 2018fyk as a Repeating Partial Tidal Disruption Event. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 942(2). L33–L33. 53 indexed citations
9.
Liu, Teng, A. Malyali, M. Krumpe, et al.. (2022). Deciphering the extreme X-ray variability of the nuclear transient eRASSt J045650.3−203750. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 669. A75–A75. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026