Hugo Vereecke

2.8k total citations
62 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Hugo Vereecke is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Hugo Vereecke has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 22 papers in Surgery and 20 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Recurrent topics in Hugo Vereecke's work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (52 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (20 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (19 papers). Hugo Vereecke is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (52 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (20 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (19 papers). Hugo Vereecke collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Hugo Vereecke's co-authors include Michel Struys, Éric Mortier, Anthony Absalom, Douglas J. Eleveld, Johannes H. Proost, Erik Weber Jensen, Laura N. Hannivoort, Björn Heyse, Koen Reyntjens and Olivier Thas and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Anesthesiology.

In The Last Decade

Hugo Vereecke

59 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hugo Vereecke Belgium 26 1.3k 597 555 453 339 62 1.8k
Thomas Bouillon Germany 26 1.5k 1.2× 679 1.1× 653 1.2× 566 1.2× 411 1.2× 76 2.3k
Tom De Smet Belgium 18 1.3k 1.0× 667 1.1× 569 1.0× 396 0.9× 168 0.5× 24 1.6k
Matsuyuki Doi Japan 21 1.5k 1.2× 644 1.1× 598 1.1× 632 1.4× 195 0.6× 73 2.0k
G N Kenny United Kingdom 17 1.6k 1.3× 790 1.3× 783 1.4× 522 1.2× 298 0.9× 23 2.2k
W. Wilhelm Germany 25 1.6k 1.2× 699 1.2× 820 1.5× 548 1.2× 184 0.5× 97 2.2k
Jörgen Bruhn Netherlands 24 1.5k 1.1× 673 1.1× 922 1.7× 477 1.1× 634 1.9× 75 2.5k
Sascha Kreuer Germany 25 1.3k 1.0× 597 1.0× 477 0.9× 518 1.1× 208 0.6× 112 2.0k
Nassib G. Chamoun United States 14 1.1k 0.8× 494 0.8× 470 0.8× 412 0.9× 396 1.2× 22 1.7k
Takasumi Katoh Japan 22 1.4k 1.1× 710 1.2× 538 1.0× 463 1.0× 153 0.5× 73 1.9k
Anne Vakkuri Finland 18 981 0.8× 468 0.8× 492 0.9× 328 0.7× 421 1.2× 49 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Hugo Vereecke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugo Vereecke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugo Vereecke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugo Vereecke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugo Vereecke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugo Vereecke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugo Vereecke. The network helps show where Hugo Vereecke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugo Vereecke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugo Vereecke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugo Vereecke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugo Vereecke. Hugo Vereecke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kalmar, Alain F., Thimo Groffen, Hugo Vereecke, et al.. (2024). Volatile anaesthetics and PFAS forever chemicals: A critical gap in environmental impact assessments. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 38(4). 342–348. 11 indexed citations
2.
Amsterdam, Kai van, Thomas Scheeren, Anthony Absalom, et al.. (2024). Comparing the haemodynamic effects of high- and low-dose opioid anaesthesia: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 38(6). 1347–1355.
3.
Vereecke, Hugo, et al.. (2024). Progress in the validation of nociception monitoring in guiding intraoperative analgesic therapy. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 37(4). 352–361. 2 indexed citations
6.
Hannivoort, Laura N., et al.. (2022). General Purpose Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Models for Target-Controlled Infusion of Anaesthetic Drugs: A Narrative Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 11(9). 2487–2487. 20 indexed citations
7.
Weerink, Maud A. S., et al.. (2019). Novel drug-independent sedation level estimation based on machine learning of quantitative frontal electroencephalogram features in healthy volunteers. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 123(4). 479–487. 14 indexed citations
8.
Colin, Pieter, et al.. (2019). Population Pharmacodynamics of Propofol and Sevoflurane in Healthy Volunteers Using a Clinical Score and the Patient State Index. Anesthesiology. 131(6). 1223–1238. 17 indexed citations
9.
Colin, Pieter, Laura N. Hannivoort, Douglas J. Eleveld, et al.. (2017). Dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modelling in healthy volunteers: 1. Influence of arousal on bispectral index and sedation. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 119(2). 200–210. 49 indexed citations
10.
Eleveld, Douglas J., Johannes H. Proost, Hugo Vereecke, et al.. (2017). An Allometric Model of Remifentanil Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 126(6). 1005–1018. 73 indexed citations
11.
Hannivoort, Laura N., Douglas J. Eleveld, Johannes H. Proost, et al.. (2015). Development of an Optimized Pharmacokinetic Model of Dexmedetomidine Using Target-controlled Infusion in Healthy Volunteers. Anesthesiology. 123(2). 357–367. 59 indexed citations
12.
Sahinovic, Marko, Anthony Absalom, Alain F. Kalmar, et al.. (2015). Comparisons of Electroencephalographically Derived Measures of Hypnosis and Antinociception in Response to Standardized Stimuli During Target-Controlled Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 122(2). 382–392. 23 indexed citations
13.
Heyse, Björn, Johannes H. Proost, Laura N. Hannivoort, et al.. (2014). A Response Surface Model Approach for Continuous Measures of Hypnotic and Analgesic Effect during Sevoflurane–Remifentanil Interaction. Anesthesiology. 120(6). 1390–1399. 19 indexed citations
14.
Heyse, Björn, Johannes H. Proost, Peter Schumacher, et al.. (2012). Sevoflurane Remifentanil Interaction. Anesthesiology. 116(2). 311–323. 38 indexed citations
15.
Coppens, Marc, Douglas J. Eleveld, Johannes H. Proost, et al.. (2011). An Evaluation of Using Population Pharmacokinetic Models to Estimate Pharmacodynamic Parameters for Propofol and Bispectral Index in Children. Anesthesiology. 115(1). 83–93. 58 indexed citations
16.
Luginbühl, Martin, Peter Schumacher, Pascal H. Vuilleumier, et al.. (2010). Noxious Stimulation Response Index. Anesthesiology. 112(4). 872–880. 43 indexed citations
18.
Schumacher, Peter, et al.. (2009). Noxious Stimulation Response Index (NSRI): Validation of a Novel Anesthetic Depth Index. Anesthesiology. 111. 1 indexed citations
19.
Struys, Michel, et al.. (2008). Comparison of the ability of two pharmacokinetic-dynamic models to maintain a predicted effect-site concentration of propofol compatible with loss of consciousness.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 59(3). 211–211. 1 indexed citations
20.
Struys, Michel, Hugo Vereecke, & Éric Mortier. (2003). Electro-encephalographic surrogate measures fail to describe the pharmacodynamic interaction between ketamine and propofol. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 57(3). 366–366. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026