Hugh V. McLachlan
- Sociology and Political Science
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- John SwalesJohn M. SwalesKim SwalesPauline M. PriorAlex ChristieMichael ScottAodheen O’Donnell
- Topics
- Reproductive Health and Technologies (14 papers)Ethics in medical practice (8 papers)Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Hugh V. McLachlan
50 papers receiving 196 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Sociology and Political Science 68
- Reproductive Medicine 67
- General Health Professions 53
- Political Science and International Relations 46
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 37
Countries citing papers authored by Hugh V. McLachlan
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh V. McLachlan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh V. McLachlan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh V. McLachlan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh V. McLachlan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh V. McLachlan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh V. McLachlan. The network helps show where Hugh V. McLachlan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh V. McLachlan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh V. McLachlan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh V. McLachlan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh V. McLachlan. Hugh V. McLachlan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | Book Review: The Medicalization of Cyberspace | 1 |
| 5 | Commercial surrogate motherhood and the alleged commodification of children: a defense of legally enforceable contracts | 9 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | No two sets the same? Applying philosophy to the theory of fingerprints | 3 |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | Moral rights and abortion. | 1 |
About Hugh V. McLachlan
Hugh V. McLachlan is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 61 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (14 papers), Ethics in medical practice (8 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (67 citations), Public Administration (16 citations) and General Health Professions (53 citations). Hugh V. McLachlan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Swales, John M. Swales, Kim Swales, Pauline M. Prior, Alex Christie, Michael Scott and Aodheen O’Donnell. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, Sociology and Work Employment and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.