Hugh J. Field
- Epidemiology top 0.5%
- Immunology top 2%
- Genetics top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Infectious Diseases top 2%
- Co-authors
- P. WildyT. J. HillG. DarbyErik De ClercqAlana M. ThackrayJosh SlaterSubhajit BiswasW. A. Blyth
- Topics
- Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (111 papers)Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (48 papers)Virus-based gene therapy research (28 papers)
- Cited by
- EpidemiologyVirologyParasitology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Hugh J. Field
131 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Epidemiology 3.9k
- Immunology 1.1k
- Genetics 874
- Molecular Biology 663
- Infectious Diseases 590
Countries citing papers authored by Hugh J. Field
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh J. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh J. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh J. Field more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh J. Field
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh J. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh J. Field. The network helps show where Hugh J. Field may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh J. Field
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh J. Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh J. Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh J. Field. Hugh J. Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 258 | |
| 5 | Protection of Specific-pathogen-free (Spf) Foals from Severe Equine Herpesvirus Type-1 (Ehv-1) Infection Following Immunization with Non-infectious L-particles | 6 |
| 6 | Protective Immune Reponses Induced by Non-infectious L-particles of Equine Herpesvirus Type-1 | 4 |
| 7 | 85 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 78 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Hugh J. Field
Hugh J. Field is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Virology and Immunology, having authored 133 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (111 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (48 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (3.9k citations), Virology (469 citations) and Parasitology (345 citations). Hugh J. Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include P. Wildy, T. J. Hill, G. Darby, Erik De Clercq, Alana M. Thackray, Josh Slater, Subhajit Biswas, W. A. Blyth, Aftab Awan and John S. Gibson. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Virology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.