Hsien‐Li Peter Peng
- Dermatology top 1%
- Neurology top 5%
- Surgery
- Clinical Psychology
- Complementary and Manual Therapy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hee‐Jin KimWoffles T. L. WuGreg GoodmanHenry H. ChanWilson HoSteven LiewJohn RogersBerthold Rzany
- Topics
- Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (16 papers)Dermatologic Treatments and Research (15 papers)Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Hsien‐Li Peter Peng
25 papers receiving 438 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Dermatology 349
- Neurology 205
- Surgery 87
- Clinical Psychology 66
- Complementary and Manual Therapy 44
Countries citing papers authored by Hsien‐Li Peter Peng
This map shows the geographic impact of Hsien‐Li Peter Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hsien‐Li Peter Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hsien‐Li Peter Peng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hsien‐Li Peter Peng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hsien‐Li Peter Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hsien‐Li Peter Peng. The network helps show where Hsien‐Li Peter Peng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hsien‐Li Peter Peng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hsien‐Li Peter Peng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hsien‐Li Peter Peng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hsien‐Li Peter Peng. Hsien‐Li Peter Peng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | Communication Concepts for Prevention and Early Intervention in Aesthetic Medicine: Consensus and Literature Review. | 0 |
| 16 | First Consensus on Primary Prevention and Early Intervention in Aesthetic Medicine. | 10 |
| 17 | PAN-ASIAN CONSENSUS-Key Recommendations for Adapting the World Congress of Dermatology Consensus on Combination Treatment with Injectable Fillers, Toxins, and Ultrasound Devices in Asian Patients. | 16 |
| 18 | 59 | |
| 19 | 47 | |
| 20 | 131 |
About Hsien‐Li Peter Peng
Hsien‐Li Peter Peng is a scholar working on Dermatology, Urology and Neurology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (16 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (15 papers) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (349 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (44 citations) and Neurology (205 citations). Hsien‐Li Peter Peng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Hee‐Jin Kim, Woffles T. L. Wu, Greg Goodman, Henry H. Chan, Wilson Ho, Steven Liew, John Rogers, Berthold Rzany, Martina Kerscher and Hema Sundaram. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Toxicon and Dermatologic Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.