How Tseng
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 2%
- biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
-
- Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Haw‐Ming HuangSheng‐Yang LeeJu-Yu ChuehChien‐Chung ChenShih‐Han HungCheng‐Yi LiuYuan‐Soon HoChih‐Hsiung Wu
In The Last Decade
How Tseng
57 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Biomaterials 529
- Process Chemistry and Technology 71
- Polymers and Plastics 142
- Automotive Engineering 94
- Orthodontics 34
Countries citing papers authored by How Tseng
This map shows the geographic impact of How Tseng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by How Tseng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites How Tseng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by How Tseng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by How Tseng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by How Tseng. The network helps show where How Tseng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside How Tseng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 123 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 37 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 67 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 467 | |
| 16 | Tissue Response and Biodegradation of Polylactic Acid Bone Screw and Plate | 2003 | 1 |
| 17 | 2002 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 20 | Bromination of regenerated chitin with tribromoimidazole and triphenylphosphine under homogeneous conditions in lithium Bromide-N,N-dimethylacetamide | 1995 | 7 |
About How Tseng
How Tseng is a scholar working on General Dentistry, Metals and Alloys, Biomaterials, Otorhinolaryngology and Orthodontics, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies (16 papers), 3D IC and TSV technologies (12 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (8 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (6 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (5 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (5 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (4 papers) and Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (529 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (71 citations), Polymers and Plastics (142 citations), Automotive Engineering (94 citations) and Orthodontics (34 citations). How Tseng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, India and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Haw‐Ming Huang, Sheng‐Yang Lee, Ju-Yu Chueh, Chien‐Chung Chen, Shih‐Han Hung, Cheng‐Yi Liu, Yuan‐Soon Ho, Chih‐Hsiung Wu, Shyr‐Yi Lin and Munenori Sakamoto. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Electronic Materials, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters and European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.