Horia Mania
- Control and Systems Engineering top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Co-authors
- Benjamin RechtStephen TuSarah DeanNikolai MatniAurelia GuyLudwig SchmidtVaishaal ShankarRebecca Roelofs
- Topics
- Control Systems and Identification (2 papers)Advanced Control Systems Optimization (1 paper)Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques (1 paper)
- Journals
- Foundations of Computational MathematicsarXiv (Cornell University)Neural Information Processing Systems
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Horia Mania
5 papers receiving 286 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Control and Systems Engineering 169
- Artificial Intelligence 125
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 55
- Management Science and Operations Research 40
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 32
Countries citing papers authored by Horia Mania
This map shows the geographic impact of Horia Mania's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Horia Mania with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Horia Mania more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Horia Mania
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Horia Mania. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Horia Mania. The network helps show where Horia Mania may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Horia Mania
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Horia Mania. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Horia Mania based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Horia Mania. Horia Mania is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evaluating Machine Accuracy on ImageNet | 21 |
| 2 | Certainty Equivalence is Efficient for Linear Quadratic Control | 13 |
| 3 | Certainty Equivalent Control of LQR is Efficient. | 16 |
| 4 | On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulatorbreakdown → | 190 |
| 5 | Simple random search of static linear policies is competitive for reinforcement learning | 58 |
About Horia Mania
Horia Mania is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 5 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Control Systems and Identification (2 papers), Advanced Control Systems Optimization (1 paper) and Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Control and Systems Engineering (169 citations), Artificial Intelligence (125 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (55 citations). Horia Mania has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin Recht, Stephen Tu, Sarah Dean, Nikolai Matni, Aurelia Guy, Ludwig Schmidt, Vaishaal Shankar, Rebecca Roelofs and Alex Chengyu Fang. Their work appears in journals such as Foundations of Computational Mathematics, arXiv (Cornell University) and Neural Information Processing Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.