Honghua Yu

3.8k citations
156 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Honghua Yu

146 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Honghua Yu
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Ophthalmology 1.1k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 989
  • Neurology 108
  • Clinical Biochemistry 77
  • Nephrology 63
Replace Hua Yan with:
Hua Yan China
Jakob Grauslund Denmark
Marco Yu Hong Kong
Chi‐Pui Pang Hong Kong
Anthony P. Khawaja United Kingdom
Tyler Hyungtaek Rim South Korea
Qi Chen China
Jerry D. Cavallerano United States
Tariq Aslam United Kingdom
Wan Ling Wong Singapore
Honghua Yu relative to Hua Yan China Hua Yan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Hua Yan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Honghua Yu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Honghua Yu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Honghua Yu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Honghua Yu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Honghua Yu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Honghua Yu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Honghua Yu. The network helps show where Honghua Yu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Honghua Yu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Honghua Yu Line = papers co-authored together Honghua Yu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 156 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019118
2 2018103
3 202158
4 201758
5 202257
6 201852
7 202251
8 202149
9 201947
10 202043
11 202241
12 201939
13 202237
14 201837
15 202236
16 202036
17 201436
18 202234
19 202131
20 202231

About Honghua Yu

Honghua Yu is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 156 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (72 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (59 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (29 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (25 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (17 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (12 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (8 papers) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.1k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (989 citations), Neurology (108 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (77 citations) and Nephrology (63 citations). Honghua Yu has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Xiaohong Yang, Yijun Hu, Dan Cao, Liang Zhang, Mingguang He, Yunkao Zeng, Zhuoting Zhu, Dawei Yang, Qiaowei Wu and Yu Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Medicine, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, BMC Medicine and Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact