Hoh Peter In
- Information Systems top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Software top 2%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Barry BoehmTaek LeeThomas L. RodgersSunghun KimJaechang NamDongGyun HanDavid L. OlsonRick Kazman
- Topics
- Software Engineering Research (31 papers)Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (25 papers)Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Hoh Peter In
48 papers receiving 748 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Information Systems 631
- Artificial Intelligence 359
- Software 239
- Computer Networks and Communications 163
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 51
Countries citing papers authored by Hoh Peter In
This map shows the geographic impact of Hoh Peter In's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hoh Peter In with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hoh Peter In more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hoh Peter In
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hoh Peter In. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hoh Peter In. The network helps show where Hoh Peter In may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hoh Peter In
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hoh Peter In. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hoh Peter In based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hoh Peter In. Hoh Peter In is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | A probabilistic approach to building defect prediction model for platform-based product lines | 1 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | A Scrum Development Process of an Agile Methodology using Concurrent Testing | 1 |
| 10 | A Quantitative ERRC Analysis Method via Requirements Cost Estimation | 1 |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 53 | |
| 19 | Cost vs. Quality Requirements: Conflict Analysis and Negotiation Aids | 6 |
| 20 | 198 |
About Hoh Peter In
Hoh Peter In is a scholar working on Software, Information Systems and Computer Science Applications, having authored 50 papers that have together received 839 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (31 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (25 papers) and Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (239 citations), Information Systems (631 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (359 citations). Hoh Peter In has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Barry Boehm, Taek Lee, Thomas L. Rodgers, Sunghun Kim, Jaechang Nam, DongGyun Han, David L. Olson, Rick Kazman, Leen Kim and Hyun Ah Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering and Computer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.