Hitoshi Neda

519 citations
26 papers · 405 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Hitoshi Neda

26 papers receiving 396 citations

Peers

Hitoshi Neda
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Pharmacology 228
  • Cell Biology 162
  • Plant Science 327
  • Insect Science 87
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 85
Replace Masaki Fukuda with:
Masaki Fukuda Japan
Bruno Granetti Italy
Komsit Wisitrassameewong Thailand
Phongeun Sysouphanthong Thailand
Chang Sun Kim South Korea
Ismaela Rossi Italy
Kozue Sotome Japan
Beata Zimowska Poland
Masoomeh Ghobad‐Nejhad Iran
Andrew L. Loyd United States
Hitoshi Neda relative to Masaki Fukuda Japan Masaki Fukuda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Masaki Fukuda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hitoshi Neda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hitoshi Neda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hitoshi Neda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hitoshi Neda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hitoshi Neda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hitoshi Neda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hitoshi Neda. The network helps show where Hitoshi Neda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hitoshi Neda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hitoshi Neda Line = papers co-authored together Hitoshi Neda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012124
2 200836
3 201228
4 201427
5 200717
6 201316
7 201315
8 201415
9 201413
10 201613
11 201213
12 201313
13 201912
14 201012
15 20127
16 20157
17 20087
18 20156
19 20146
20 20045

About Hitoshi Neda

Hitoshi Neda is a scholar working on Plant Science, Pharmacology, Cell Biology, Insect Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (21 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (18 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (9 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (6 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (2 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (2 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (2 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (228 citations), Cell Biology (162 citations), Plant Science (327 citations), Insect Science (87 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (85 citations). Hitoshi Neda has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Yuko Ota, Hitoshi Murata, Akira Ohta, Akiyoshi Yamada, Katsuhiko Babasaki, Masataka Kawai, Chihiro Tanaka, Genshiro Kawai, Atsushi Morita and Kosuke Izumitsu. Their work appears in journals such as Mycorrhiza, Mycologia, Mycoscience, Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry and Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact