Hiroto Tadano
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Numerical Analysis top 5%
- Mechanics of Materials
- Co-authors
- Tetsuya SakuraiTsutomu IkegamiKinji KimuraYasunori FutamuraY. KuramashiHideaki TakeuchiTakeo KuboJun‐ichi Nishizawa
- Topics
- Matrix Theory and Algorithms (25 papers)Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (13 papers)Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- JapanSwitzerlandIreland
In The Last Decade
Hiroto Tadano
50 papers receiving 597 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 244
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 226
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 191
- Numerical Analysis 123
- Mechanics of Materials 74
Countries citing papers authored by Hiroto Tadano
This map shows the geographic impact of Hiroto Tadano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hiroto Tadano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hiroto Tadano more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hiroto Tadano
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hiroto Tadano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hiroto Tadano. The network helps show where Hiroto Tadano may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hiroto Tadano
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hiroto Tadano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hiroto Tadano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hiroto Tadano. Hiroto Tadano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Hiroto Tadano
Hiroto Tadano is a scholar working on Numerical Analysis, Computational Mathematics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 633 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (25 papers), Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (13 papers) and Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (18 citations), Numerical Analysis (123 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (244 citations). Hiroto Tadano has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Switzerland and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Tetsuya Sakurai, Tsutomu Ikegami, Kinji Kimura, Yasunori Futamura, Y. Kuramashi, Hideaki Takeuchi, Takeo Kubo, Jun‐ichi Nishizawa, Isemi Igarashi and Mitsuhisa Sato. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.