Hippolyte d’Albis

1.6k citations
87 papers · 768 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Hippolyte d’Albis

79 papers receiving 713 citations

Peers

Hippolyte d’Albis
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Demography 214
  • General Health Professions 299
  • Economics and Econometrics 282
  • Gender Studies 92
  • Accounting 96
Replace Matteo Cervellati with:
Matteo Cervellati Italy
Christophe Courbage Switzerland
Michele Campolieti Canada
Markus Hahn Australia
Konstantinos Tatsiramos Luxembourg
Tammy Schirle Canada
Fabrice Murtin France
Constance F. Citro United States
Emily Wiemers United States
Patrik Marier Canada
Hippolyte d’Albis relative to Matteo Cervellati Italy Matteo Cervellati's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Matteo Cervellati · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hippolyte d’Albis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hippolyte d’Albis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hippolyte d’Albis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hippolyte d’Albis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hippolyte d’Albis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hippolyte d’Albis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hippolyte d’Albis. The network helps show where Hippolyte d’Albis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hippolyte d’Albis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hippolyte d’Albis Line = papers co-authored together Hippolyte d’Albis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201861
2 200551
3 201341
4 201634
5 201132
6 201826
7 201525
8 201721
9 200920
10 201520
11 201720
12 201519
13 202018
14 200518
15 201418
16 202016
17 201816
18 201716
19 201814
20 201513

About Hippolyte d’Albis

Hippolyte d’Albis is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Demography, Sociology and Political Science and Accounting, having authored 87 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Care Issues (35 papers), Economic theories and models (16 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (16 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (14 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (13 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (8 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (8 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (214 citations), General Health Professions (299 citations), Economics and Econometrics (282 citations), Gender Studies (92 citations) and Accounting (96 citations). Hippolyte d’Albis has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ekrame Boubtane, Dramane Coulibaly, Emmanuelle Augeraud‐Véron, Miguel Sánchez-Romero, Fabrice Collard, Magali Barbiéri, Magali Mazuy, Didier Breton, Alexia Prskawetz and Sau‐Him Paul Lau. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Economics, Economics Letters, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Economic Theory and Journal of Economic Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact