Hina Nazli
- Soil Science top 10%
- Agricultural risk and resilience 12
-
- Agricultural Economics and Practices 5
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices 3
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets 5
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 4
- Safety Research top 10%
-
- Income, Poverty, and Inequality 6
-
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research 4
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 4
- Co-authors
- Sohail J. MalikZahoor Ul HaqKarl MeilkeMélinda SmaleRashida HaqZafar Mueen NasirNargis SultanaGeorge E. Battese
- Partner nations
- United StatesPakistanCanada
In The Last Decade
Hina Nazli
28 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Soil Science 93
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77
- Economics and Econometrics 175
- Safety Research 50
- Business and International Management 9
Countries citing papers authored by Hina Nazli
This map shows the geographic impact of Hina Nazli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hina Nazli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hina Nazli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hina Nazli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hina Nazli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hina Nazli. The network helps show where Hina Nazli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hina Nazli, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 3 | Varietal Integrity, Damage Abatement, and Productivity: Evidence from the Cultivation of BT Cotton in Pakistan | 2016 | 4 |
| 4 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 7 | Smallholder Farming and Crop Variety Choice: Wheat Variety Choice in Pakistan | 2014 | 3 |
| 8 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 9 | An Analysis of the Development and Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology in Pakistan | 2012 | 3 |
| 10 | FOOD DEMAND PATTERNS IN PAKISTANI PUNJAB | 2011 | 17 |
| 11 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 47 | |
| 16 | Estimates of Unrecorded Private Capital Movements | 1999 | 2 |
| 17 | 1999 | 21 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 22 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 5 |
About Hina Nazli
Hina Nazli is a scholar working on Soil Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural risk and resilience (12 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (6 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (5 papers), Agricultural Economics and Practices (5 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (4 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (93 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (77 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (175 citations). Hina Nazli has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Pakistan and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sohail J. Malik, Zahoor Ul Haq, Karl Meilke, Mélinda Smale, Rashida Haq, Zafar Mueen Nasir, Nargis Sultana, George E. Battese, Paul A. Dorosh and Patricia Zambrano. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Food Policy and Agricultural Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.