Hilary O. Box
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Developmental Biology top 1%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Kathleen R. GibsonMaria Emília YamamotoSteve ForrestBenjamin MillerG. W. Max WestbyRobert HubrechtMaria de Fátima ArrudaF.S. Albuquerque
- Topics
- Primate Behavior and Ecology (18 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (11 papers)Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBrazilGermany
In The Last Decade
Hilary O. Box
27 papers receiving 846 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Social Psychology 535
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 349
- Ecology 225
- Developmental Biology 209
- Genetics 121
Countries citing papers authored by Hilary O. Box
This map shows the geographic impact of Hilary O. Box's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hilary O. Box with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hilary O. Box more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hilary O. Box
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hilary O. Box. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hilary O. Box. The network helps show where Hilary O. Box may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hilary O. Box
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hilary O. Box. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hilary O. Box based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hilary O. Box. Hilary O. Box is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | Comparative Vertebrate Cognition: Are Primates Superior to Nonprimates? | 9 |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 83 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | Graphical access to symbol databases | 1 |
| 15 | 58 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Hilary O. Box
Hilary O. Box is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Social Psychology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 897 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primate Behavior and Ecology (18 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (11 papers) and Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (209 citations), Social Psychology (535 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (349 citations). Hilary O. Box has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen R. Gibson, Maria Emília Yamamoto, Steve Forrest, Benjamin Miller, G. W. Max Westby, Robert Hubrecht, Maria de Fátima Arruda, F.S. Albuquerque, Camila Domeniconi and Mary C. Dyson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wildlife Management, International Journal of Primatology and Behavioural Processes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.