H.F. Monteiro

666 citations
41 papers · 446 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

H.F. Monteiro

37 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

H.F. Monteiro
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 360
  • Animal Science and Zoology 68
  • Small Animals 37
  • Nephrology 25
  • Genetics 92
Replace Shoukun Ji with:
Shoukun Ji China
Greg B Penner Canada
Ezequias Castillo‐Lopez Austria
Qinghua Qiu China
Shirley Motta de Souza Brazil
Thomer Durman Brazil
J.T. Sylvester United States
S. Ramos South Korea
Jiachuhan Wang China
G.J. Lascano United States
H.F. Monteiro relative to Shoukun Ji China Shoukun Ji's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Shoukun Ji · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.F. Monteiro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.F. Monteiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.F. Monteiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.F. Monteiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.F. Monteiro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.F. Monteiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.F. Monteiro. The network helps show where H.F. Monteiro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H.F. Monteiro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H.F. Monteiro Line = papers co-authored together H.F. Monteiro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202071
2 202249
3 201743
4 201524
5 201820
6 202220
7 201818
8 202117
9 201614
10 201914
11 202213
12 202313
13 202112
14 202212
15 202310
16 202010
17 20239
18 20219
19 20228
20 20208

About H.F. Monteiro

H.F. Monteiro is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Animal Science and Zoology and Plant Science, having authored 41 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (31 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (13 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (7 papers), Gut microbiota and health (5 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (4 papers), Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (3 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers) and Animal health and immunology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (360 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (68 citations), Small Animals (37 citations), Nephrology (25 citations) and Genetics (92 citations). H.F. Monteiro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include A.P. Faciola, Eduardo Marostegan de Paula, Lorrayny Galoro da Silva, Xiaoxia Dai, F.S. Lima, Pedro Del Bianco Benedeti, Bart C. Weimer, G.A. Broderick, Simon R. Poulson and Igor F. Canisso. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, Scientific Reports, Journal of Animal Science, Theriogenology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact