Hervé Raynaud
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Co-authors
- Kenneth J. ArrowJohn Bonner
- Topics
- Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper)European and International Law Studies (1 paper)
- Cited by
- General Decision SciencesManagement Science and Operations ResearchEconomics and Econometrics
- Journals
- The Economic JournalFuturesRePEc: Research Papers in Economics
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Hervé Raynaud
6 papers receiving 280 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Management Science and Operations Research 148
- Economics and Econometrics 135
- Artificial Intelligence 78
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 38
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 34
Countries citing papers authored by Hervé Raynaud
This map shows the geographic impact of Hervé Raynaud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hervé Raynaud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hervé Raynaud more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hervé Raynaud
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hervé Raynaud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hervé Raynaud. The network helps show where Hervé Raynaud may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hervé Raynaud
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hervé Raynaud. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hervé Raynaud based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hervé Raynaud. Hervé Raynaud is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 244 | |
| 2 | Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making | 55 |
| 3 | The individual freedom allowed by the value restriction condition | 7 |
| 4 | Conditions for Transitivity of Majority Rule with Algorithmic Interpretations. | 0 |
| 5 | Paradoxical results from Inada's conditions for majority rule | 4 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Sur les graphes aléatoires | 2 |
About Hervé Raynaud
Hervé Raynaud is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Economics and Econometrics and Law, having authored 7 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper) and European and International Law Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (26 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (148 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (135 citations). Hervé Raynaud has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth J. Arrow and John Bonner. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, Futures and RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.