Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Red Sea Crisis: ramifications for vessel operations, shipping networks, and maritime supply chains
Countries citing papers authored by Hercules Haralambides
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hercules Haralambides's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hercules Haralambides with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hercules Haralambides more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hercules Haralambides
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hercules Haralambides. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hercules Haralambides. The network helps show where Hercules Haralambides may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hercules Haralambides
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hercules Haralambides.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hercules Haralambides based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hercules Haralambides. Hercules Haralambides is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pelagidis, Theodore & Hercules Haralambides. (2020). What Shipping Can Tell Us About Europe’s Efforts to Face the Risk of COVID-19-Induced ‘Japanification’. World Economy. 21(3). 29–40.1 indexed citations
9.
Pelagidis, Theodore & Hercules Haralambides. (2019). The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and China’s European Ambitions. World Economy. 20(3). 221–232.2 indexed citations
Haralambides, Hercules & Helen Thanopoulou. (2014). The Economic Crisis of 2008 and World Shipping: Unheeded Warnings. Econstor (Econstor). 64(2). 5–13.9 indexed citations
Haralambides, Hercules & Michele Acciaro. (2010). Bundling Transport and Logistics Services in Global Supply Chains. Chapters.3 indexed citations
14.
Golias, Mihalis, Stephanie Ivey, Hercules Haralambides, & Georgios K. D. Saharidis. (2010). Maximizing Throughput and Minimizing Tardiness and Earliness at a Cross Dock Facility: Biobjective Formulation. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).3 indexed citations
15.
Acciaro, Michele & Hercules Haralambides. (2008). Product bundling in global ocean transportation. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1–23.2 indexed citations
Haralambides, Hercules & Roger Behrens. (2000). PORT RESTRUCTURING IN A GLOBAL ECONOMY: AN INDIAN PERSPECTIVE. EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam). 27(1).13 indexed citations
18.
Haralambides, Hercules. (1991). AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE SEA-GOING LABOUR MARKET. Logistics and transportation review. 27(1).3 indexed citations
19.
Haralambides, Hercules. (1986). ESTIMATION OF LAID-UP TONNAGE IN COMPETITIVE SHIPPING MARKETS. Logistics and transportation review. 22(2).2 indexed citations
20.
Haralambides, Hercules. (1986). INVESTMENT IN SHIPPING AND THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS SHORT-RUN EQUILIBRIUM FREIGHT RATE. 13(3).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.