Henry Dufour
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Neurology top 1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Genetics top 2%
- Co-authors
- S. FuentèsF. GrisoliJean RégisPhilippe MétellusOlivier ChinotDominique Figarella‐BrangerT. AdetchessiW Pellet
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (25 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (25 papers)Meningioma and schwannoma management (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Henry Dufour
81 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Epidemiology 958
- Surgery 939
- Neurology 773
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 646
- Genetics 437
Countries citing papers authored by Henry Dufour
This map shows the geographic impact of Henry Dufour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henry Dufour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henry Dufour more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Henry Dufour
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henry Dufour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henry Dufour. The network helps show where Henry Dufour may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Henry Dufour
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Henry Dufour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Henry Dufour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Henry Dufour. Henry Dufour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Repeated blood–brain barrier opening with a nine-emitter implantable ultrasound device in combination with carboplatin in recurrent glioblastoma: a phase I/II clinical trialbreakdown → | 54 |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 62 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 86 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 77 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | [Contribution of magnetic resonance spectrometry to the diagnosis of intracranial tumors]. | 6 |
| 19 | 227 | |
| 20 | 52 |
About Henry Dufour
Henry Dufour is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Genetics, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (25 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (25 papers) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (773 citations), Genetics (437 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (646 citations). Henry Dufour has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include S. Fuentès, F. Grisoli, Jean Régis, Philippe Métellus, Olivier Chinot, Dominique Figarella‐Branger, T. Adetchessi, W Pellet, Benjamin Blondel and Xavier Muracciole. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.